/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>54456104
>Oxymoron,
hahahaHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
What the everloving fuck are you talking about?
Not only does this not make sense historically due to the fact socialism requires a state and every time socialism was tried it was EXTREMELY statist, but this doesn't even make sense in terms of marxist theory.
Marx and Lenin said socialism was the statist transitionary stage after capitalism and then the state will wither away and form communism, which they claim is stateless.
You don't even understand your own retarded ideology.

>Demonstrably false,
Cool. I'll demonstrate it then.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch02.htm
>1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
>2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
>3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
>4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
>5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
It's right fucking there, number 5.

>You can't have free market capitalism without a central bank.
Then why were the best periods of capitalism without central banks?
It's like you're saying you cannot have capitalism without socialized medicine or you can't have capitalism without nationalized steel? What the fuck are you talking about?
Capitalism by definition means a free market, not a government monopoly on banking and currency creation.
>There are no laws to prevent industry collusion, to the point where only one entity can be said to be operating.
The state is required for monopolies. It's the free market that breaks up monopolies due to businesses being forced to compete.

>Nice self-description.
Listen to yourself.

>>52353627
Not an argument.
You're actually unironically wrong and have no argument.

>>50518675
btw get in the helicopter

>>27275972
>>I-If only Ron Paul rises from the dead in 2024 that'll show you!
Literally true. We wouldn't have these massive stock market bubbles and these wall street criminals would actually be punished.
If you weren't a socialist bootlicker you would actually understand this.
Keep begging for more money printing though lol

>democratic socialism
LMAO HAHAHAHAHAHA
You mean those policies that have failed every single time? The policies that Scandinavia has moved away from? I'd rather live in free market Switzerland than socialist Cuba or North Korea.
Lick more boots

>>27083297
>comrade, I bought 2 stocks back in september, hodling the line 'til the porkies come knocking
lmao you're a mass of contradictions and everyone in this movement wants you dead.
I can't wait for you to attempt your bootlick "revolution" so the people can rise up and slaughter you animals.

>>25851225
>Why the fuck aren't Western countries doing this to social media platforms and making them a utility?
Because communism doesn't work and communists deserve to die.

>>25818738
(1/2)
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-addressing-threat-securities-investments-finance-communist-chinese-military-companies/

Section 1. (a) The following actions are prohibited:

(i) beginning 9:30 a.m. eastern standard time on January 11, 2021, any transaction in publicly traded securities, or any securities that are derivative of, or are designed to provide investment exposure to such securities, of any Communist Chinese military company as defined in section 4(a)(i) of this order, by any United States person; and

(ii) beginning 9:30 a.m. eastern standard time on the date that is 60 days after a person is determined to be a Communist Chinese military company pursuant to section (4)(a)(ii) or (iii) of this order, any transaction in publicly traded securities, or any securities that are derivative of, or are designed to provide investment exposure to such securities, of that person, by any United States person.

(b) Notwithstanding subsection (a)(i) of this section, purchases for value or sales made on or before 11:59 p.m. eastern standard time on November 11, 2021, solely to divest, in whole or in part, from securities that any United States person held as of 9:30 a.m. eastern standard time on January 11, 2021, in a Communist Chinese military company as defined in section 4(a)(i) of this order, are permitted.

(c) Notwithstanding subsection (a)(ii) of this section, for a person determined to be a Communist Chinese military company pursuant to section 4(a)(ii) or (iii) of this order, purchases for value or sales made on or before 365 days from the date of such determination, solely to divest, in whole or in part, from securities that any United States person held in such person, as of the date 60 days from the date of such determination, are permitted.

But what IS a commie, anon?

>>21805899

>Tries to imply that I'm racist

The correct answer is ' Y E S'.

Bonus points for posting pic related.