/biz/ - Business & Finance

So i keep seeing tons of posts about how this is a fake company using a name and logo similar of the real Zeus Capital and that this is a straight up case of FUD....but....

Whilst i agree that the company may not be that legitimate and that the same could be said about the author i dont understand why noone has properly been able to refute the "so called facts" within the report?

Why hasn't the founders of chainlink refuted any of the points within the document?

I personally hold LINK but have sold 50% of my stack and i probably will buy back in and quadruple my stack if it keeps dropping but i wanted to take some profit while i could as i bought cheap cheap.

Maybe the content in the report is bullshit but please can someone properly go through the 50+ document and call out why it is bullshit instead of just saying its a fake report and fake company.