/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>11780048

I'm not going to explain that to you right at the moment. I'm going to say that... any recognize what that is? That's a Wolfram 110. Anyone know what a Wolfram 110 is? It's the simplest Turing-complete system. That's in Bitcoin. It was running until a few months ago. We had PSOs in Bitcoin, running. Unfortunately they starved to death---fees.

So we had the first self-evolving in Bitcoin, that ran for two years. There are people that know about these now; that's why I'm mentioning them. They've been discovered. It's not just me. They're dead! Because they can't afford the fees. And I'm not going to fund a thing requires $3.00 every bloody block to keep running, it becomes expensive very quickly. When it's low fees, all sort of things can run. So, these are there.

IP to IP transactions. Does no one look at the old code any more? We keep saying, "this is not meant to be there." The market database in Bitcoin allowed IP to IP transactions. There was a reason for these. The whole idea is to have a merchant-type solution. I should be able to go up and just tap something, and I don't even give a shit whether my transaction has settled properly. All I care about is going up to the merchant, and the merchant will propagate my transaction.

Why will the merchant propagate my transaction? Because they want to get paid. Merchants are not going to sit there and go, "well, maybe at the end of the month I'll run all this shit." They won't, because you will double spend. Merchants have the incentive to ensure that zero-conf works right now. Why? Because they want to be paid!

It's very simple. Economics makes this work. It is not security toys. It is not any of these little fluffy bits of crap that we say are really security the network.

>Greg is so certain that Craig isn't Satoshi because he believes Satoshi is dead.
When he worked for Juniper networks he had extensive contacts with and demands made upon him by the state and was always a good soldier, the plan to destroy bitcoin was formulated and put into motion by central banks and the state, and they chose Maxwell as a convenient agent due to his political reliability and positioning and familiarity with the dystopian result of the bitcoin experiment courtesy of the psychopathic megalomaniacal sadistic ramblings of one Mircea Popescu.
The state told Maxwell Satoshi was out of the picture. Invoked the nightmare scenario of Mircea getting his way, and Greg agreed to sabotage the whole thing with funding from them via AXA and used blockstream as the vehicle to do so.

>He thinks he's doing the necessary and right thing. Not realizing he's just a useful idiot for the state.

>Mircea may well be their own creation. A false flag for what could happen if the state wasn't around to prevent gladiators and snuff films. They honestly also think they're so necessary of course.

>But the same mass of individuals who would not stand for such a situation and would use the state to prevent it will just as happily use Blackwater-du-jour to prevent it if it comes to that.

>It's all lies and bullshit to try and close what they see as Pandora's box, but the explosion of dozens of viable alts has made it clear they're not going to be able to control the architecture, no matter what. So the attempt has mostly been abandoned and now it's just a simple money making play and the hope the existing system can at least stand some chance of continuation via core and lightning.

>The US government "lost" 21 trillion last year. This is their war chest for the continued fight with the acceleration of cryptocurrency destroying the system of states and central banks, and they're using it to slowly gain stake in the arising new great game.

>>11653695

Get fucking rekt you faggots, I'm so sick of hearing about your horseshit oracle problem.

Buy Bitcoin (cash) and hold.