/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>28285972
Don't lie to me fagot, I've been here since 2018 and am the original caller of the $100 in 2021 timeframe
>>28285962
Who cares what the returns are? Tech doesn't lie. Marketshare and implementation is what matters

>>27687041
Think bigger.

>>27460432
>the whales don't want to make a much money as possible
...

You have no fucking idea what fantom actually is. It's not the next link, it's not the next eth, it's being bred to be the nezt Bitcoin.

people laughed when I said this, but think of it this way.

— CBDCs will not be based on Bitcoin. (Bitcoins are anonymous as far as retail banks and smaller financial entities are concerned) . I think this will be more for the grey market and as a store of value

— CBDCs will be a tremendously YUGE market. Many trillions, just by nature of a nation shifting its money supply to CBDCs

— a 'better bitcoin' would have smart contracts, bank-grade security, and be interoperable with CBDCs. I would also guess smart cities and the like, for good measure

— a 'better bitcoin' would be based on Ethereum, where momentum and developers are already had

— since the market will be so big, there will be room for a variety of players, each with their own Ethereum-based solution. (XRP isn't it, since there have been too many large and dubious transactions)

there is more to this, but it's all speculation of course, also you retards don't believe the evidence in front of you as is. :)

>>26923186
There is a difference between projects that say something vs projects that show something. Tech doesn't lie. I've spent thousands of hours looking into fantom, and I can confidently say it will be worth over $100 in 2021. People don't know what fantom is yet

100x is nothing, believe me.

>>25492969
Don't bother asking because I know you aren't going to dig through to find out. This is info you will otherwise never learn :)

Also, you need to see how everything connects to see the path.

If you know you know