/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15179353
So you're telling me, instead of sending one wallet 1 transaction, they're doing 20+ transactions to, end up at the same 1 wallet. What does this accomplish?

>>15179854
I showed you that nobody was picking up what dev wallets were sending, thus they were dumped on the open market. Linkies have two contradicting damage control scripts for this. First, they claim that Oracle are for some reason buying LINK tokens to gift to startups, second they claim that LINK is being sold to fund something. Which makes LINK a funding token, you're fucked either way you try arguing this. Its like trying to defend Bitconnect.

>>15179925
Play? You're not in my league. You can watch me do it though, like this.

>please provide evidence mr.Detective that :
1.700k batches were released into market in huge sell orders

You fucked it right at the beginning, trying to ask for evidence that that you want and know isn't there, as opposed to the real evidence. Does babby know what an iceberg order is? We both know only chinks market dump millions of tokens. Maybe you should learn about markets.

>2. Who bought those orders, name of companies and inviduals , since it's blockchain you can track it right
Someone told you that ETH addresses contain people's names and personal information. Who lied to you?

>3. Which wallets got bigger from top 1000
None.

>4. Which new big wallets (50K+) were created after every batch released
None.

>5. How many LINK, exact number left Binance to private wallets.
Binance doesn't have a wallet just for Chainlink to dump into, its for everyone so the trail goes cold.

Well that was easy, you thought you were smart asking for dumb imaginary shit didn't you, thinking you could stump me. LMAO

>>15180021
And you got baited like a dumb fuck into posting your chubby hand.

Why is your screen resolution set to grandpa?
HAHAHAHAHA
Is this why you can't see graphs and conduct any research, you're literally blind?