/biz/ - Business & Finance

>mfw sold 500m for $200 2 weeks ago

>$50 stablecoin

>>28054702

Why would anyone sell at this point? It's clearly not going away, especially with the stake of the richest man in the world.

>>27679262
>went to buy 200 UNI worth at 0.008,
>transaction failed
>decided it was dumb so knocked it down to 50

I could have been a whale anon

>>27430919
What i don't get is like...how can they expect me to think the stock is just dead now when they are still restricting how much you can buy

>>27029585
>paid fud shill

>>25188373
>nocoiner calling others 'sheep'

>>25146839
>2 7pc tendies
>large mac n chee
>8 biscuits
>2 large lemonades
jesus christ nigger what are you doing, your blood must be a viscous pile of chicken grease and fructose

>>23912432
>buy 51% of a company's shares
>you literally own the company now
How difficult is it to understand this anon? Do you have the big stupid?

>>21931244
>didn't buy the dip

>>17071225
>Daily
nigger i read this board every day and this reminder isn't posted daily

also can we get a new voucher that isn't several years old?

>>12444121
>/pol/, /r9k/, /b/

>>11392811

>hold on for dear life

>>10814879
>be white
>under 6" and small dick
>women don't even know you exist
...
>be asian
>just over 5 feet
>based non-feminist traditional asian women all over your tiny dick

>>6493359
>Squier

Answer this in one sentence.

WHY THE FUCK WOULD DGB IF IT WON A SHITTY TROPHY THAT NO ONE CARES ABOUT?

>is going to break out of its meme triangle
>posts order book

K.

>>3362840

Welp, OP. You got fired. Lets hope you don't get imprisonment for OPSEC failure.

>>3176919

>weak team

>meme website with cartoons

>no actual products

>no beta


You fuckers are dumb. All the signs were there.

Learn to invest.

>>3109392

>pretending to be a retard.

Oh jeeez

>>3101768

later FUD.

>>2214550
>memebook

>>1780819
>give me one good reason why a paid, licensed financial advisor should be allowed to put their own interests ahead of the clients.
Because it's not about putting the advisor's interest ahead of the client's. That's exactly the sort of gross oversimplification I was arguing against. Reputable financial services companies generally take care of their customers because a reputation for shady dealing is toxic in finance. The difficulty comes when investments turn sour (which, statistically, they -do- from time to time) how do you PROVE that you WEREN'T acting in bad faith.

The cases aren't perfectly analogous but imagine your relative goes to the doctor, the doctor says your relative has a serious medical condition and needs to be operated on immediately. Your relative goes in for surgery and during the surgery complications arise and your relative dies. How does your doctor now prove that his recommendation of surgery was the right choice? Essentially, this is what the DoL rule is, but it applies to far more than just doctors prescribing surgery. It applies right on down to the CVS employee saying "Headache? Buy some aspirin."

I'm not saying the issue is too nuanced to talk about. People absolutely should talk about it and there's convincing arguments to be made in both directions, but you can fuck right off with the jingoistic simplifications, ignorant snark, and snide "I'll be waiting" BS.