/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57503589
gee if only there were some kind of cryptographic system that could guarantee an insurance payout once certain conditions are met

>>28272812
>it leads it
strange to me that people seem to forget how and when the summer defi run began
>5 July 2020

>>26120685
no, because i haven't made enough yet

Shoo Ranjeesh.

>>24943826
>To where?
Go back

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_YszOAU8Z4

i miss link anon

>>22500281
Sure, but as of now, Arbitrum simply computes solidity contracts trustlessly off chain at high throughput, it has nothing to do with manual human arbitration (I'm not sure what that really means even).

I remember anon posting a webtool that stacked all the depth charts from the top exchanges so that you could see the entire depth of market on a single depth chart. Anyone know what this tool is or if it's still being maintained. I would really like to use it right now.

He seems so unassuming as a person, and yet he draws such profound reactions out of people. Some instantly see a new future in him; others seem to instantly trip over themselves with anger and hatred at him. From day one, from the moment anyone becomes aware of him, it's been like that.

Why is this? Why such intense devotion and intense hatred?

First I thought I was buying for the memes.
Then I thought I was buying for the tech.

Eventually, I realized the truth: I was buying because of this man right here.

canst thou feel it, dearest anon

>>18044279
the two will happen at the same time: nodes will want to stake LINK because it will earn them the right to service higher value contracts, and receive more compensation (in LINK), this reduction in supply will also cause price in increase (in the face of constant or increasing demand), this new higher token valuation will persuade contract owners to operate on chainlink enabled smart contract platforms since they can offload of lot of risk onto nodes, bascially, existing contract owners want higher economic assurances so they choose nodes with bigger stakes, nodes stake more to compete for contracts, supply shrinks, token value rises, then even BIGGER value contracts can be collateralized, the cycle continues until we reach an equilibrium, where they equilibrium lies depends on demand for smart contracts on blockchains or other platforms that will get data via chainlink's decentralized oracles, what we are all betting on, and for good reason (frightening levels of cost savings), is that demand for chainlink enabled smart contracts will be high and in high value markets

>4.95

>>17464256
>>17464267
>>17464283
>>17464287
Are you ok buddy?

>>17307504
Rakesh?

First I thought I was buying for the memes.
Then I thought I was buying for the tech.

Eventually, I realized the truth: I was buying because of this man right here.

only two important points to take from this thread:
>t sigs, mixicles, deco, staking, etc are in the pipeline
>freemium needs to end at some point

>>17132745
>what is time dilation?
read a book dude

>>17040044
No. Why would a coin that's entire value is generated on a now long dead meme gain any value?

what happens when you wageslave? How does it feel to really be in love with someone who always wants more money than you? And if you are worried that she will find someone else when you pass away, who is going to love you best?


This sizzling, sexy novel is the story of Rosa Anayama. Rosa is a drifter who is in search of a man she is in love with. At the same time, Rosa has to run a small-time anime shop in Kyoto. But she cannot stay in Kyoto forever and wants to live in the real world. So, on the verge of retiring, Rosa decides to accept a job as a clerk at a textile mill. But what's the real purpose of her assignment?

>>16966148
you can understand chainlink at a high level and still have enough reason to all in desu senpai

>>16955453
This was always pitched as a 3+ years hold. Don't overcommit on something that's such a huge risk. Keep a small portion of your portfolio and if it does change the world buying in at these prices you'll easily be satisfied. The reality is this is a monumentous task and RSR statistically speaking will likely never achieve its goals.

>>16941963
>To be even more frank, it just looks bad.
Roasties were a mistake.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XB401RfGMlM