/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>58997279
>https://www.enterprisetimes.co.uk/2020/04/02/celsius-network-partners-with-chainlink-to-extend-financial-platform/
>https://x.com/chainlink/status/1280909841591144448
better now?

>>58867305
>you lost money on bancor!
I never understood why people like you think this is a "gotcha" and you keep repeating it like a broken record
chances are, (You)'re the one who actually lost money on that shit, because (I) for sure never touched it
so, what gives? anyone care to explain the train of thought here?

>>58756571
huh, funny how you mentioned Bancor and Linkpool, kek

>>58742081
funny how you mentioned Bancor, heh

>>49372389
I hate to tell you this, but chances are you will be bummed. This is not me being a Debbie downer. I am just trying to lower people's expectations on staking being released within the next 3 months. It will probably be discussed, but a different feature will be talked about in debth.
>>49372398
I dont have lots of proof. More of things said by Sergey and Johnny recently. If you watched the twitter space chat you would know more. Especially Johnny mentioning he believes after staking goes live over 98.5% of LINK will be locked in nodes after a year. This is not all just for SLS collateral. See if you cant find this chat. Look and see what Bancor and Paypal have in common when it comes to Chainlink.