/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>59088957
well said fren

>>57390696
>>57390682
Why so butthurt today, fren? Trannysis wont go anywhere, no matter how much you REE at him, and you know it.
Got a bad day? I can listen to you if you want to. Sometimes that's all is needed to feel better and evacuate the frustration.

>>57085202
U 2 fren

>>56907692
Thanks for those. You're TSLA anon right?
It's hard to get any engagement in trading threads, which is why I have long periods of time when I stop posting about trading on /biz
If you don't promise instant results or easy gains people lose interest.

>>56671426
Never average losing trades, you can get away with it for a while.

>>56671320
>>56671333
No problem frens
If anyones curious
https://pastebin.com/Vtg1hD2G

>>56671381
Not OP, but to answer
"How much of it do you put in each trade?"
You should always think in terms of how much $ to risk, not how much $ to put into a trade.
Differing trades will have differing amounts of risk. For example
Tesla might = 1% Risk
Small Cap Momentum Name = 5-10% Risk
Weekly Option Contract on a Monday-Thursday might be 10-20% Risk
A 0DTE (0 Day Till Expiration) might be 50%
So depending on what you're trading you need to line up your position size so that the amount risked if you get stopped out will be fairly equal. (When you're newer, as you get experience you can start using exponential bet sizing on higher quality higher EV generating names)
If you're risking $100 per trade you'd buy
$10,000 of Tesla
$1,000-2,000 of The Small Cap
$500-$1,000 of the Weekly Option
$200 of the 0DTE
All of those would equal roughly $100 when stopped out.
Just look at your entry price minus your stop price to calculate your risk per share, then divide the amount of risk you want to take per trade by that # and it'll tell you how many shares to buy.
If you want to risk $200 on a trade, and your entry is $75.50, your stop is at $74.50, then you're risking $1.00 per share (ignoring slippage), take $200 / by $1 of risk and it'll tell you to buy 200 shares.
>>56671501
>"I switched to trading large caps exclusively and I stopped trading all day long, limiting myself to the first 30 minutes of open only (as that's where 80% of my profit was anyways and trading all day caused me to take shitty trades and chop up my gains from the morning)"
This is the way. There's lots of very successful day traders that trade nothing but the open. I find that by around 11:00am you can usually call it day. Newer trades have a bad habit of thinking more trades = more money, when it's usually the opposite.

>>56396446
Gimme few minutes fren, i'll do the QRD the clean way on paint.

>>52859932
I'm so proud of you, fren.

>>52310154
Thank you scrapfren for your kind words, i'll make sure to ask you for tips and help when needed. It's time for me to accept cheapies in my life.

>>29532853
thanks fren for the tips

>>26316327
>All right, thanks for the discussion and I'm sorry for the misunderstanding as well as if anything which I said seemed impolite.
Yeah me too i'm sorry fren.

> I am entirely convinced that Satoshi is Adam Back
Same here, and to see he have ties with both the NSA and bankers is of no surprise. Remember who designed SHA-256?
I'm convinced BTC is not the work of a single man, more likely a team of cryptographs and devs recruited by the NSA or one of their shell companies.

>>21347184
It's ok fren, simply do it step by step, but you have to start TODAY.
Simply dip a toe to begin with : your mission for today is to purchase at least 1 ounce of silver.
Once you receive your coin you'll finally feels what's like to hold real money with intrinsic value and all your fears will vanish, believe me.
I was just like you not so long ago : spooped by everything, especially by investing and speculating. But i went in progressively until having most of my net worth far from cash, and now i'm up 80% compared to last year.

You must understand the riskiest move imaginable (and the least profitable one) is holding cash.

>>19999098
It's ok fren, not everyone is bound to make it anyway. At least you tried.

>>18689703
>If anything we'll see a lot more fiat and a lot more inflation
You can't infinite inflation, simply because no trust in money end up in a halt of money velocity. Only trust can restart the engines.
You really lack the basics bro, i really advise you to watch hidden secrets of money, the whole serie, it's a very nice introduction to these concepts, especially episode 7 who basically explain what we are living right now and how hyperinflation always end up.

>>12268512
it's ok fren, sorry too then

>>8428349
i don't own any crypto and don't want to, i'm just here for the apus and the pink wojacks, and i"ve to say you are posting all my favourites memes sir, well done mr Green.