/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>58099810
We're getting the Krugman timeline, faggot.

>>57969245
It's not hyperinflation, just 3-4% "historically normal" inflation.

Hyperinflation comes with the next recession and stimulus measures.

>>57857878
Finally, the prophecy will be fulfilled.

>>57508753
To play devil's advocate, the world we know did not exist 100 years ago, and it's just as likely to exist in the next 100 years as not. Even the great city of Rome fell eventually. That's not to say the world is ending, but the future really is uncertain. Besides that, picrel for example suggests that the markets might in fact fizzle away in the next 20 years

>>57471337
>>57471368
Technically the market reopens around 175. At which point we all get in a race with the money printer.

>Market closed
>Credit crisis

>>57378688
I thought we escaped it.

I THOUGHT WE ESCAPED IT!

>>57015231
>>57015229
> but if your competition jerks the devs/customers around
In other words, extracts higher profit margins? The winner can charge whatever they want within reason, the loser is left to pick up the scraps. To be fair, the loser could MAYBE make it up on volume if they have a massive and I mean massive capacity advantage. But that seems unlikely on small nodes.

>>56971512
Unless SPY plunges 150 points in the next two weeks, I think it's safe to say we averted the Krugman timeline.

>>56521982
There is only one man who can bring us back to life.

>>56499954
This is /smg/'s official forecast until it's either disproven or someone comes up with a better shitpost.

>>56488781
I know, what part of "Krugman comes to power" do people not understand? I really wonder.

>>56476710
I did, and am bagging those SPY 250 put LEAPs

Reminder that SPY closes the year right around 300.

I don't make the rules.

>>56473427
Wrong. SPY will be 200 by the end of *next* year.

>>56469869
You mean under 200.

>>56426473
Correct. The real war doesn't kick off for another few years, when China smells blood in the water.

>>56399585
>spy is still too damn high because boomer buy megacap instead of bonds.
Yes, but they'll hear on CNBC about "ooh, 5%! Safe and risk free!" and their two neurons will fire until they call their financial advisor and swap QQQ for TLT.

That's how we end the year at SPY 350.

>>56389747
Yes. Though obviously in a WW3 scenario, we'd have fun deflationary steps taken such as rationing and price controls on wages.

>>56336394
That basic bubble chart has been around since damn near the first days of /biz/. It's a classic.

>>56323249
Yeah, by the early 2040's. But it's a bumpy ride to get there.

>>56295820
Exactly. Humans don't change, so their patterns repeat. They're predictable.

The heeming will continue until we replace Powell.

>>56273407
>ball crushing austerity, default, or hyperinflation
You're right: those are the only options. And, in fact, we'll get to enjoy all three.