/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>22193162
It's not that Gold is gonna go down, it's that the relative value of Silver is set to increase in comparison (ie, the GSR).
Say in a hypothetical, Gold goes from 2k to 3k and stays there crabbing +-200 (as I said, hypothetical, these numbers aren't meant to be solid predictions of how ar the moon mission's gonna go, just easy numbers so you understand my point). Meanwhile, Silver goes from 25 to 50 (since Silvers volitility usually does better on crash shorts, its almost always expected to go higher than Gold on the shorts).
Now, say you've got 10k to throw around in this hypothetical. If you were to invest in Gold to begin with, you could get 5oz now, increasing to 15k value, leaving you with a 5oz hold post0crash. Meanwhile, you went all in on Silver, it goes from 10k to 20k on the short - at which point you move that shorted Silver into Gold for a post-crash portfolio, and end up with 6.6oz of gold instead of 5oz, to hold for the period in which Gold does better than Silver (the recovery).

So in essence, you use Silver now, to get more Gold later; while still staying all in on the PM market as the rest of the economy crashes around it. However, without the incoming crash, Gold would usually be my recommendation over Silver for non-diversified portfolios.
Hope I've made it understandable.

>asanagi
>>japanese shadman
lmfao cuckhold, get better taste in anime whores