/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>53765958
Hello world.

>>53753990
>>53755467
>>53756113
>>53756245
>>53756423
>>53756432
>>53756552
>>53756784
>>53757004

>>53756666

I hereby declare that I do not give my permission for any living being to manipulate or cause harm to my body, mind or soul.

I do not consent to any act of coercion offered by any party public or private, including decrees, demands, ultimatums, entrapments, or laws/rules declared absent participatory public debate. I will follow the natural laws of my society, as did my father and his father before him. I will scorn the insulting bureaucracy and rule-by-decree of our Political Class.

I will advocate for the separation of Culture and State. I will point and laugh at those who designate themselves "Lawmakers" in the media they control. I understand that digital access to global markets will set me free from those who seek power over my life.

I have not, do not and will not participate in the the elite's "Great Reset" or "4th Industrial Revolution" pageantry, though I have a duty to remain informed about what happens in our world.

Harassment directed towards my person, my property or my voice by any party is an attack against the Vox Populi, which is sacred to our civilization and must be defended.

I don't consent to:

-Digital IDs controlled by third parties
-Forced Vaccinations
-Vaccine passports
-A cashless society or its digital equivalent
-Attacks against free cryptocurrencies
-Demonetization
-Social Credit Scores
-FATF regulations used as sword instead of shield
-Civil forfeiture
-Taxation for services I do not use
-Regulations that stifle the free enterprise of free people
-Mandatory quarantines of healthy people
-Mandatory voting

ALL CONSENT IS REMOVED; I WILL NOT VOTE AND GIVE MY IMPLICIT CONSENT TO THE POLITICAL CLASS AND THEIR SYSTEM. I DO NOT CONSENT TO BEING GOVERNED SAVE BY THE WILL OF MY OWN CLEAN CONSCIENCE IN THIS WORLD.

ALL KARMA SHALL FALL AGAINST THOSE WHO VIOLATE MY CONSENT; GOD SEES ALL VIA THE INTERNET OF THINGS MAN HAS CREATED.

Buy.

>>53519327
>>53519883

This is probably true, though I wonder what happens to money when private sector AI prediction models become more competent than whatever tech our exhausted bureaucracies have built over the last decade. In my reasoning, it's like comparing Nasa's Saturn Series to the SpaceX rockets: sure, the latter presupposes the research and sovereign investment that created the former, but once this initial investment and R&D has taken place there is no way for the public sector to maintain its technical advantage.

If they truly have access to all extant social and market data, what do our hypothetical private sector AI prediction models think of fiat currency regimes in general? Where would they be allocating portfolio resources so as to hedge against this cyclical risk?

And why do we tend to assume that the private and public sectors in our societies have aligned macro-economic objectives?

>>53519327
>>53519883

This is probably true, though I wonder what happens to money when private sector AI prediction models become more competent than whatever tech our exhausted bureaucracies have built over the last decade. In my reasoning, it's like comparing Nasa's Saturn Series to the SpaceX rockets: sure, the latter presupposes the research and sovereign investment that created the former, but once this initial investment and R&D has taken place there is no way for the public sector to maintain its technical advantage.

If they truly have access to all available social and market data, what do our hypothetical private sector AI prediction models think of the USD as a financial asset? Where would they be allocating portfolio resources so as to hedge against it?

Why do we tend to assume that the private and public sectors in our societies have aligned macro-economic objectives?

>>53499926
I don't have access to any information except what's in the public domain, and I've shared my thoughts here for you. As for benevolence, I suppose that depends on which side of this trade you as a market participant find yourself on.

>>53500038
I don't hold traditional financial assets, and I don't plan to until I can hold my Digitized Financial Assets in self custody and without a
counterparty.

If your assets can be frozen arbitrarily, you are not sovereign. If someone else holds your financial assets on your behalf, to what extent are they actually your property? This is a central aspect of the data-ownership I discuss. To re-iterate, your financial assets are your most valuable data.

The dollars you see in your chequing accounts are indeed dollar derivatives; each digit you see is merely your claim on a dollar. You're thus
putting a great amount of trust in the speculative power of the institutions to which you provide liquidity. Do you want to know what your counterparties have been doing with your liquidity? FTX users found out a few months early.

Many of our Canadian friends will never forget the moment their finance minister herself stood before the podium and declared The Party master of all citizens' bank accounts without legal supervision. Surely our Cypriot anons still sting from having been robbed by their banks in 2013. After the last few years, isn't it evident to you that the only inviolable property law remaining in our societies is that of 1's and 0's?

>>53500077
Nope, not me -- though posts like his are why I frequent this gathering place over the many others available to us

>>53489915
>>53489835

And remember, that long-term Ukranian debt is marked as an "asset" on someone's balance sheet somewhere. Just how do you think those bag-holders will go about trying to collect their money?

This is why nations go to war -- don't you see it? Everyone here rambles about how all wars are started by the little financiers pulling the strings behind the scenes...but didn't anyone bother to try to understand the actual mechanisms by which these strings are pulled?

>>53464907
>>53464945
>>53464968
>>53464991
>>53465049
>>53465096
>>53465376
>>53465401
>>53465725

See

>>53484078
>>53484078
>>53484078

>>53479908
>>53479991
>>53480150

See

>>53476977
>>53476977
>>53476977

But want to know the punchline?

The real inner circle of serious wealth will emerge in the more esoteric corners of the market, upon which this new economic environment will come to depend for technical reasons. The real power will flow towardsa small group of network financiers, who will come to form their own organizations. Select incumbent powers like certain tech companies, smart-money funds and maybe certain factions from within the state apparatuswill almost certainlybe part of these emerging guilds of network free-holders and institutional operators. These guilds will act as a vanguard of this emerging economic renaissance.

Same as it’s always been — a small cadre of financiers truly decide what happens in our world. But this time the new elite will not be made up of those born into the right family or those members of exclusive societies at American (and formerly British) universities. By necessity the new elite will be comprised of those who best understand the obscure and technical economic plumbing which underpins our society.

The highest-levelsocial problem our time — that the tired and aging bureaucrats, financiers and elite are no longer dexterous, capable or motivated enough to run the increasinglycomplex systems we depend on — solves itself in this way.

Hello anon,

I’m an old friend of yours, and I’ve returned from long wanderings with good news to share. Let’s talk here, in our new public square — in this open and free marketplace of ideas we both frequent. Will you allow me to make a few predictions?

I think GME is going to re-enter the public consciousness soon. I think GameStop is going to launch a service that will be game-changing, and I believe that the resultant liquidity event that GME undergoes will begin a cascade of significant social and economic changes. Follow me for a moment through my speculations, won’t you? I’d love to hear your thoughts.

I’ll tell you before we begin that I neither hold nor intend to buy GME, and I have no relationship of any kind with the company itself or with any of its current financiers.