/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>28900966
I mean, anything over 100% is literally impossible, so fine with me.

>>28846162
Then why are banks buying in /more/ anon?
They think there is a good business plan in buying in millions at 50, then letting it drop to 20, then 0?
You think the largest firms like Blackrock are just going to throw money away just because, despite insider knowledge?
Are you just this stupid, or are Pajeets this bad at irony?

>>28700973
>only just now going over 50 regularly
Again, a nigger this stupid must be a joke.

>>28646632
Oh you want me to dumb it down ok sure.
>Longnoses shorted (said they would buy at a later date) more than double the assigned stock.
>People caught on
>People starting buying stock
>Longnoses shake them off with the robinhood shit
>Rival Longnoses smell blood in the water
>Are currently keeping the price above 50, likely to fuck Melvin.
Make enough sense?
We got Longs going in HARD.

>>28435749
Prove any of these, because all of this is bullshit.
Plus the double spacing ousts you INSTANTLY as not being from around here. The most we tolerate is the single space. If you it there and think "Well what about readability" then you are a cuck and need to go back to plebbit
Also SET CHO ASS DOWN, nigga.
This is a fight to the death.

>>28419576
BlackRock literally upped their shares from 8.6 million to 9.2 million last Friday, tell me what data you have that shows they sold since then instead of making vague unsubstantiated claims

>>28286243
>>28286243
There's the kicker.
All of the data we are getting is all we are allowed to be shown.
If you can't find it, what makes you think we can, lemme see if i can...aha, had to pop into last thread and get this screenie.

>>28280474
>>28277729
Most recently, BlackRock upped their stake from 8.6 million shares to 9.2 million last Friday. Morgan Stanley, Vanguard, and Fidelity are all instances of institutional ownership as well.

>>28251795
BlackRock upped their position from 8.6 million to 9.2 million last Friday