/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>30391709
Nobody would want to "hide their marital assets" in MONERO which is highly unstable, when they could buy USDC and USDT stablecoins and keep them on trezor. Courts are none the wiser.

>>30394919
>>30394919
>>30394919
>>30394919
>You can leverage 50,000 debt out of a 7 figure portfolio.

>Let's say you have 1,000,000 USD.

>You want to invest in a speculative asset. Instead of using your actual money. You just get a loan for 50,000.

>Because 50,000 is nothing, you basically 50,000 for FREE

But why would you do this?

Because to take 50,000 in debt you have to pay additional percentages.

But if you just put 50,000 of your money upfront you don't have to pay loan percentages.

So what is the difference?

Just the time value of money?

> Because 50,000 is nothing, you basically 50,000 for FREE

But you don't. Since it's a loan you have to pay back 50,000+%interest.

> The worst that can happen is that your investment goes sour, and at the very worst it goes to 0 meaning you end up with a 950,000 portfolio. But in the long run this doesn't really matter because it's still a lot of money.

But wouldn't you end up with less than 950,000 since of loan percentages? Nobody loans out money for nothing?

> However the potential gains you can end up with offset the bad. Let's say for example that your investment goes from 50k to 100k. That means your total portfolio is now 1,050,000 after paying off the debt.

But if you originally paid 50,000 of your 1,000,000 to do the same thing you would also have 1,050,000 without debt. What is the difference?