/biz/ - Business & Finance

Seriously, what is the suicide and make it stack for GRT?

Also, don't you find that GRT lacks quality memes?

why do bears exist? its infinitely more fun and profitable to trade in bull markets

So there are many link breadcrumbs, but how many of these do you think are just NDAs until the time is right? Or on the other hand which breadcrumbs do you believe to be taken completely out of context?

I.e. - the google 'blogpost' that many like to claim was only a blogpost, but there has been proof since to show that the two parties are still working together. Is this an NDA until the time is right, or just a breadcrumb taken too far?

post your favorite link breadcrumbs and your opinions on them, I just can't wrap my head around how many NDAs are in action right now or if im just a schizophrenic retard

>>16414193
The top of the next bullrun lies somewhere in 2021, assuming we have the same 4 year cycle as we've always had. I also bought link at sub 20 cents.

>>16379120
>Are things going to slowly fade away over the next few years?
Do you even follow the news?
2019 has been 100x more bullish for crypto adoption going forward than 2017 was, yet its not reflected in the price. 2017 was all hype and buzzwords.

We are literally witnessing the birth of digital currency wars before our years. Even in 2018 governments were calling crypto a joke. Now they're being forced to look at it seriously or be left behind. We may still see scams/memes moon going forward, but in the actual long term it will be platforms that provide value and have large network usage that will grow the most.
We are literally just beginning.

>>16329998
>im short since 12k. cope
post short then

>>16243576
I have 30 links.
Guess i'm a whale now.

>>16119253
It's quite simple. Assuming the math checks out, the next bullrun will send the overall market cap into the trillions. Something like XRP reached a $150B mcap at the peak in 2017. Many useless shitcoins also ballooned into ridiculous market caps.
Now I personally don't think literal scams/memes will moon massively like they did in 2017, in fact I think most will continue their bleed to 0. This is good though, as it will leave even more of a market share for the projects that do deliver real value. The oracle problem IS worth quite a lot of money. Whoever delivers on it will profit massively. For now, Chainlink is the only project actually working on a solution and you'd be stupid not to have at least a suicide stack.

Of course you could say that bubbles won't happen twice, but that's what they were saying in 2015. I wouldn't bet against bitcoin and against crypto.

>>16069707
I know I wasn't an early adopter, but you can go back in the archives if you really care enough. There was a LOT more legit and well thought out FUD, instead of the copypastas and obvious shill/discord raids that LINK faced/faces still.
The less time to wait is true but consider the fact that the window of opportunity was also tiny as well. If you weren't smart/lucky enough to sell the top you really missed out on a lot of gains, and in a rather quick time span. ETH really dumped into oblivion thanks to the ICO craze.

>>16069714
>I don't know how anybody can sincerely think this.
I sincerely think this because I believe in crypto. The oracle problem is the most valuable thing in ALL of crypto. If LINK failed tomorrow, I would be searching for the next decentralized oracle network. Some people really fail to grasp how much long term value such a network has. It is a natural monopoly and whoever can claim it will be worth a FUCK ton of money.

>>15978559
WERE REALLY GOOING TO DO IT, ARENT WE?

WERE ALL FUCKING GOING TO BE MILLIONAIRES

>>15968211
>do you believe in this chainlink crap thing?
How can I not? It's what's made me money in 2018/2019 while most alt bagholders went -95%. There are so many alts that were shilled in 2017 that are totally forgotten now. If you're new I can understand asking this question but seriously DYOR. Even from a purely TA perspective, Chainlink is one of the best buys out there.

>How was here back in 2016-2017 ?
Hard to explain for anyone that wasn't there. Archives exist and I suggest you use them. Like I said earlier, early 2016 felt quite similar to now. The board was dead because everyone thought crypto was dead.
2017 was its own beast and I'm sure the memes speak for themselves. I would not compare it with Chainlink shitposting though. Chainlink is unlike anything before it. In 2017 we really had no clue what we were buying. No one did in depth research as was done with Chainlink.

>>15964514
Because smart contracts will result in ASTRONOMICAL cost cutting, generating massive profits for the first company who leaps onto the tech first. From there all it takes is this one company doing well, forcing everyone else to adopt smart contracts or be left in the dust. After that, it's all network effects.

>>15958226
ctrl f have sex

not really, quality went down after link started to pump and I say this as someone who has held link since 2017

regarding crypto, all that's needed to be said has already been said. why talk about the same fundamentals over and over? it should be obvious what's good and what isn't by now
there are still traditional finance and economy threads but they're getting rarer

we're just here to pass the time shitposting really. i suspect it will get better when the bull market arrives.

bump

i'm sure linkanon will make a summary video or some autist will find a new crumb

>>12923987
lets go faggit, take your pants off and get on with your larp

>>12021391
t. Delphi
also,
>wearing pants

>wearing pants

>>11960051
>wearing pants

>>11909882

>>11847027

>>11831578

By posting pantless gnomes.

>>11830113

>Get
>YOur
>LINks
>TOMORRow
>FRIENds

How close am I to deciphering this anon?