/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55102175
oh yea they had that one ICP puff piece where they tried to blame Dom dumping 15000x bags on retail as being Sam's fault kek

>>55064482
>never had a real partnership
topkek. Here's a just a sample of the companies building public avalanche subnets right now
>Vodafone
>Alibaba
>SKplanet
>Professional Bowlers Association
>FIDE
>Spruce subnet with T.Rowe Price, Wisdomtree, wellington management, and cumberland
AAA games such as
>Shrapnel
>Off the Grid

>It's all a elobarate marketing scheme to get niggers like >>55062093 (You) to invest their lifesavings in.
Funny you should mention that, please see picrel. If you bought ICP you are exit liquidity for the team or seed round investors kek
>They can just fork it!
Yes as is possible with all permissionless, decentralized protocols. But they will be missing the seamless interoperability of the avalanche network of subnets which is the whole point.
>Deloitte
was never going to be a public subnet. Do you really think deloitte was going to put FEMA recovery documentation/renumeration information on a public ledger? It's takes like this that make you a retard. The point is the tech is real and it's better than any other protocol.
>ICP can't be forked
Yea because it's a closed permissioned system, dfinity literally controls the network. If the VM is open source though it could of course be repurposed.
>FederItaly
literal who. ICP has no actual adoption and nothing is made better for end users by using it, it's just shitty laggier web2.0 clones. ICP is strictly worse performance wise than AWS/traditional cloud and there is no way around that.

>>55028975
Dom fucking confirmed the basic premise of that legal filing himself, see picrel kek.
The only thing that is tenuous is that Dfinity specifically was targeting this employee in particular. Instead of going on cringey, cry baby twitter rants over protected speech he could instead post the receipts that document the token distribution and dox the relevant wallets to prove that it's just baseless FUD. But yet he still doesn't, instead threatening to sue literal who ETHfluencers over tweets making fun of ICP and pushing his pet cryptoleaks blog. Absolute glaring red flag behavior from a founder/CEO.

>>54165419
>>54165510
keep seethe posting please, I get endless entertainment out of midwits shilling an endlessly dumping VC/insider scam thinking it's some massive breakthrough when its subject to all the same protocol level limitations SOL, Cosmos, ETH, etc are.

>>54130235
Does not have the throughput at a protocol level to support this. ~1000 user writes per second for the best case scenario of an entire subnet dedicated to dapp simple enough to fit in a single canister is an absolute joke given the node hardware. Almost every other POS chain can surpass this minus ETH, ICP's party trick is glueing a bunch of homogenous "chains" together but you'll still hit that bottleneck either way assuming anyone of note starts using IC.
>>54134158
Blatantly false, typical ICP baggie resorting to outright falsehoods to shill their coin
>>54138636
Not only are the boundary nodes not decentralized, every single node on ICP is permissioned, it's literally how the protocol operates and is in your whitepaper if you retards could read kek. Not to mention something like 8 companies control 80% of the nodes and they all have to live in centralized server farms. This is compounded by the fact that IC subnets have probably some of the worst replication factors of any chain today.

Also reminder, the team and insiders dumped on retail for 15,000X profits. Don't believe me? Take it from the head of dfinity kek

>Yea they were day 1 employees
>Yea we payed their salary in ICP
>Yea they definitely dumped on retail and are now super rich
>N-n-no they aren't insiders bro they just got lucky.

Do ICP chuds really?

>>53961642
Was there ever any doubt kek.