/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>26039802
I have no bearing on that, you can ask them.

>>26039783
idgaf tranny, it's all the tranny gang here to cause comotion. I'm here to clear shit up.

>>26039960
Put it this way.

>If it's on it's own chain, it can be 51% attacked
>If it's using DPOW or any other type of "signature" bullshit, it's few particular nodes can be regulated and have the IP addresses tracked and that dude can be SWATED, best believe

Therefore, it must be ONCHAIN and if can't be on BTC's chain, it has to be on Ethereum's chain, the second biggest chain in terms of hashing power and has legitimate uses so they can't shut it down.

>If it uses ring signature, it can be cracked or have it's nodes taken down
>Zcash doesn't even use ring, it's a giant fucking tumbler
Tumbling is naturally the weakest form of privacy. You'd have to combine Monero's ring which is the BEST form of privacy with history deletion, which CANNOT occur on custom chains.

Contracts are stateless in nature and respond to calls from the EVM, which is how BUCC I assume did it. Manipulating the memory and data and then they plan on other contracts for this shit, obfuscating and memory-holing anything and everything.

Zero node consensus. Zero debate. Someone just releases something to scale the privacy further and it's taken up anther notch. Right on chain.