/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55268157
>>55268174
Actually, adding to the point, I remember making this a little while ago in response to someone calling the "accumulation pattern" unique.

>>55268272
Fwiw, I've lost a decent chunk of money on LINK in the past just from not having sold as much as I should. It still made me money of course but the opp cost was absolutely enormous, unlike any opp cost I'd had before or since. Wish you luck and lucidity and good fortune. It's been a rough few years for everyone.

>>54707218
Ever since the dream (illusion) shattered, I've had to admit what I've long known but ignored: LINK holders will point to a condition, or behaviour, or circumstance they might observe applying to LINK and claim categorically it happens exclusively to LINK, yet do zero due diligence to prove those conditions or behaviours are unique in any way to LINK versus other alts. This has worsened over the last 2 years as only the bottom of the barrel retards (including me) are left holding the bag and rationalising its underperformance.

I prepared the attached specifically for this thread. I simply went down the list of alts and compiled their 1Y charts per the OP. Suspending all subjectivity for a minute, does Chainlink's chart really look so distinct? There were of course other alts I did not include who did have noticeably different charts, such as TRX, MATIC, TON, some others, but this is the question here: is Chainlink's chart unique? Does it even deviate from the fucking norm whatsoever? Per OP:
>"Why is Chainlink doing this?"
Well, most other alts are doing more or less the same.

Yes, we can have a nitty-gritty conversation about which alt bottomed precisely where, look at other pairs, measure ranges, or any other tedium, but as far as OP's low-effort impression that LINK is behaving in some self-evidently unique way, provable by a single screenshot of its chart, is the kind of complete and utter bullshit groupthink on biz that has caused most of us to hold this shit and be JUSTed through 1.5 cycles. There's nothing special about LINK's price performance above any other alt that was ever the trending thing for a while. So I've started calling it out rather than just think it, which I have hundreds of times while reading this kind of unsubstantiated bullshit bias ego-defending apologism on this waterhole of retards that is biz. You're all full of shit. You're all larping. I don't give a fuck about futurism theories. I care about ROI, and you do too.