/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55603870

>>53571243
>Stake LINK to help secure the network!
Thing is ...
How exactly does me donating 7000 of my LINKs back to smartcontract make the network more secure?

>>52882951
>Obviously they're learning that there is no way to make it secure.
exactly
this message just screams "we can't figure out how to make it work"

>>52567344
>we know it's supposed to come out this year
post source
If you're referring to the January 1st youtube video, he said staking would be this year, but no date for CCIP

>>51674562
Getting close now, anon.

>>50387692
jesus we really are early

>>49354543
>>49354554
I don't understand what you're trying to communicate, but I appreciate the reply.

>>49354497
I agree some projects are waiting on CCIP.
But any road from here is a looong slooooow build up of network usage.

I disagree wholeheartedly that big players (Oracle, Swift, Google) are actually eager to be early adopters. They can afford not to be.
None of the "big names" are going to jump into this quickly, because the optics are so bad if something goes wrong. No, the big players will wait until reliability and the overall network are already well-established.

So my point is, "staking changes everything" is simply incorrect. Staking changes nothing. It opens the door for the next phase: another five years of bagholding and (hopefully) adoption. But it's going to be slow.