[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.15829409 [View]
File: 7 KB, 250x250, 1515217768246s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15829409

WTF WAS THAT

>> No.12886090 [View]
File: 7 KB, 250x250, 1551298255453s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12886090

>he didn't buy REQ when it was .01
***YOU ARE HERE***
>he didn't buy REQ when it was .02
***YOU ARE HERE***
>he didn't buy REQ when it was .05
>he didn't buy REQ when it was .10
>he didn't buy REQ when it was .15
>he didn't buy REQ when it was .20
>he didn't buy REQ when it was .25
>he didn't buy REQ when it was .30
>he didn't buy REQ when it was .35
>he didn't buy REQ when it was .40
>he didn't buy REQ when it was .45
>he didn't buy REQ when it was .50
>he didn't buy REQ when it was .70
>he didn't buy REQ when it was $1
>he didn't buy REQ when it was $5

>> No.10745587 [View]
File: 7 KB, 250x250, 1534186347391.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10745587

APOLOGIZE

>> No.10682495 [View]
File: 7 KB, 250x250, 1530275975217.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10682495

Do I really have to search around for my pasta?

>> No.10678162 [View]
File: 7 KB, 250x250, 1530275975217.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10678162

>> No.10674565 [View]
File: 7 KB, 250x250, 1530275975217.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10674565

>a redditor, who reposted an older comment and films himself microwaving food, hacked wikimedia and spoofed an email because he's part of a korean whale group that wanted to buy the dip because of a coinbase listing
This is what reqlets actually believed.

>he didn't sell REQ at 1.20
>he didn't sell REQ at 1.10
>he didn't sell REQ at 1.00
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.90
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.80
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.70
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.60
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.50
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.40
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.30
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.20
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.15
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.10
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.05


*********************YOU ARE HERE***************


>he didn't sell REQ at 0.01
>he didn't buy rope

>> No.10530800 [View]
File: 7 KB, 250x250, 1530275975217.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10530800

>a redditor, who reposted an older comment and films himself microwaving food, hacked wikimedia and spoofed an email because he's part of a korean whale group that wanted to buy the dip because of a coinbase listing
This is what reqlets actually believed.

>he didn't sell REQ at 1.20
>he didn't sell REQ at 1.10
>he didn't sell REQ at 1.00
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.90
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.80
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.70
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.60
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.50
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.40
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.30
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.20
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.15
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.10
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.05


*********************YOU ARE HERE***************


>he didn't sell REQ at 0.01
>he didn't buy rope

>> No.10521777 [View]
File: 7 KB, 250x250, 1517897810371.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10521777

>>10521046
All in REQ

>> No.10456901 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 7 KB, 250x250, 1517897810371.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10456901

SOMEONE IS DUMPING RIGHT NOW

>> No.10426656 [View]
File: 7 KB, 250x250, 1517897810371.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10426656

>>10426633
INCLUDE ME IN THE SCREEN CAP

>> No.10257761 [View]
File: 7 KB, 250x250, 1528679903679.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10257761

Just remember, life could be worse; you could have been a REQ holder. AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

>> No.10257345 [View]
File: 7 KB, 250x250, 1531441513233.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10257345

WHAT ABOUT LINK AND REQ

WHAT ABOUT MY BAGS

>> No.10247999 [View]
File: 7 KB, 250x250, 1517897810371.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10247999

>stuck under 1100 sats

>> No.10237884 [View]
File: 7 KB, 250x250, 1517897810371.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10237884

>>10237837
>>10237870

>> No.10192002 [View]
File: 7 KB, 250x250, 1530054135455.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10192002

Good times

>> No.10186912 [View]
File: 7 KB, 250x250, 1517897810371.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10186912

Sub-1100 sats tomorrow

>> No.10131521 [View]
File: 7 KB, 250x250, 1517897810371.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10131521

>>10131481
i am a REQ whale with more than 10 million REQ, all of which i acquired below ICO price back in october. REQ performed way better than i thought it would in december/january, and i cashed out more than enough to live comfortably for the next few decades.

after cashing out a few million dollars, i let my remaining 10MM REQ tokens ride. however, after realizing the volume for REQ on binance was so drastically low, i figured it was more profitable to actively manipulate the market, than to hope for another bull run of 2017 proportions.

so i dumped.

and dumped.

and dumped.

i found the best time to dump was not when the price was tanking (medium-sized bag holders with 100k+ tokens will take care of that for you), but when the price was mooning - or looked like it was about to moon. here's a secret for you: REQ has some of the weakest bulls of any coin on binance. usually it only takes less than a million tokens, efficiently timed, to crush any small pump and take REQ/BTC ratio back into the red for the day, where it ought to be.

want to know why for the last 38 days on binance, the REQ/ETH chart only has seven - yes, seven - green 1-day candles?

because of me.

want to know why everything today seems to be in the green, but REQ is still struggling to make it back above 10 cents, and has currently dipped to rank #148 on coinmarketcap?

because of me.

i refuse to let the price go up, and i won't for a while. in case you're wondering, that 10MM tokens i let ride now exceeds 13MM, simply from doing this over, and over, and over again.

i am a bagholder's worst nightmare.

>> No.10092135 [View]
File: 7 KB, 250x250, 1530054135455.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10092135

i am a REQ whale with more than 10 million REQ, all of which i acquired below ICO price back in october. REQ performed way better than i thought it would in december/january, and i cashed out more than enough to live comfortably for the next few decades.

after cashing out a few million dollars, i let my remaining 10MM REQ tokens ride. however, after realizing the volume for REQ on binance was so drastically low, i figured it was more profitable to actively manipulate the market, than to hope for another bull run of 2017 proportions.

so i dumped.

and dumped.

and dumped.

i found the best time to dump was not when the price was tanking (medium-sized bag holders with 100k+ tokens will take care of that for you), but when the price was mooning - or looked like it was about to moon. here's a secret for you: REQ has some of the weakest bulls of any coin on binance. usually it only takes less than a million tokens, efficiently timed, to crush any small pump and take REQ/BTC ratio back into the red for the day, where it ought to be.

want to know why for the last 38 days on binance, the REQ/ETH chart only has seven - yes, seven - green 1-day candles?

because of me.

want to know why everything today seems to be in the green, but REQ is still struggling to make it back above 10 cents, and has currently dipped to rank #148 on coinmarketcap?

because of me.

i refuse to let the price go up, and i won't for a while. in case you're wondering, that 10MM tokens i let ride now exceeds 13MM, simply from doing this over, and over, and over again.

i am a bagholder's worst nightmare.

>> No.10088783 [View]
File: 7 KB, 250x250, 1528679903679.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10088783

Oooooh reqlets.
Looks like coinbase didn't add this turd, who would have thought?
Even link is up 10% in btc.

>> No.10080673 [View]
File: 7 KB, 250x250, 1528679903679.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10080673

>a redditor, who reposted an older comment and films himself microwaving food, hacked wikimedia and spoofed an email because he's part of a korean whale group that wanted to buy the dip because of a coinbase listing
This is what reqlets actually believed.

>he didn't sell REQ at 1.20
>he didn't sell REQ at 1.10
>he didn't sell REQ at 1.00
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.90
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.80
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.70
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.60
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.50
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.40
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.30
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.20
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.15
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.10


*********************YOU ARE HERE***************


>he didn't sell REQ at 0.05
>he didn't sell REQ at 0.01
>he didn't buy rope

>> No.10056248 [View]
File: 7 KB, 250x250, 1528679903679.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10056248

Meh, I don't care anymore. Making fun of iconlets and wanlets is much more entertaining right now.
See you at at 5 cents ;)

>> No.10048714 [View]
File: 7 KB, 250x250, 1530054135455.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10048714

Well well well, here we are REQ marines! Under 1200 sats! And you know what's next, right? Sub-1100! 6 cents incoming! But keep holding, Coinbase Pro is going to save you guys, right? If the price ever goes up, whales won't totally bomb the price while all simultaneously stepping out of this shitshow, right?

>> No.10047732 [View]
File: 7 KB, 250x250, 1528679903679.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10047732

REQT.
Reminds me of shitlink.

>> No.10043215 [View]
File: 7 KB, 250x250, 1528679903679.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10043215

Who's buying this dip? XD Feels like stealing :D

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]