/biz/ - Business & Finance

Can’t the Swiss government just issue a bailout to Credit Suisse?

Friendly reminder that you can buy PRQ on coinmetro if you don't want to pay gas

>>28006088
If something has almost no value it doesn't take much to bump it exponentially

>>27503547
I will answer both of them in the same way, and you better post proof of you buying 10k$ BTC.

1. Probably yes.
2. It might be, but it won't. See below.

So, let's say, for argument's sake, that things happen instantenously. It's the first day of 2030, erryone's balls deep into BTC, it's like 30% of theor 'folio or something. Total, global cash. Awesome future.
Google then hits the market with Q1, their first gen quantum computer that can be used to hack BTC. This is obviously very bad. The BTC crowd, knowing all too well that this shit is bad, chaange the algorithm of BTC to something that cannot be hacked by a quantum computer. (There are tasks like that.) Because it's a decentralized crowd, this will fork BTC into numerous versions. This has already happened with scams like BCH, though the change there was nothing as fundamental as I'm talking about here. Anyhow, all forks will have one thing in common: The original blockchain will be common.

Why? Because that will ensure that everyone who uses BTC before the 2030 quantum-apocalypse will be on-board with the fork, automatically. Sure, you won't know which will be the "next" BTC. For a while. Till some Vitalik-tier autist comes up for a definitive mathematical proof about why BTCQ, some obscure fork of BTC in February, is actually super fucking awesome and he can prove that it's unhackable. People pile onto that, it soon rises to BTC's orig price, everyone but a couple of crypto-historians abandon the original BTC blockchain and we all live happily ever after.

Yes, it's a clusterfuck when it happens, BUT all you have to do is not spend your money. All the money that was in the orig blockchain will stay there, so you'll be able to carry it over.

>tl;dr ppl would just fork the shit out of BTC till they came up with an alternative that's quantum proof

To all the GME retards who are still holding or who sold at a loss: Buy silver while it's at the dip, at least then you know you have something with tangible value.

Nano is finally pumping from it's bottom, and has some real traction with normies on plebbit and such. Maybe this could be something we all get in on now and shill before dumping on more normie fucks... pic related

>pull back foreskin and leave it there
>after a few days (/weeks) it starts to permanently stays there
>enjoy literally all the benefits of being cut without any of the downsides
>cutfags are eternally BTFO because anything that might be of benefit to them can be thus achieved

There is literally no argument against this, cutfags. Go suck on your (((overlords)))' mutilated dicks.

>>8931676
Passive investing is a meme. Stocks and REITs can cut their dividends. Real estate can be mismanaged and rental markets can change. Businesses can shit the bed. In all of these cases, your capital will get decimated at the same time that your passive income is drying up.

>>7967323
>go outside, rape a woman
>give her 10$ afterwards
>don't understand why she's upset
This is you.

>>6965281
You're an idiot. Let me break it down to you so even someone with down syndrome could understand it, maybe you'll get it that way:
>You add things in your cart (listed in $).
>You decide after 1-2 hours of browsing that you wish to buy your cart
>Proceed to checkout
>Offer option to pay with crypto
>Click it
>This will cost you <X crypto>. This offer expires in 2 minutes. Do you wish to proceed?
>Yes --> You send the crypto (it shows, because 0 confirmations is enough)
>"We have received your <crypto of choice> transfer. Once we get to Y number of confirmations, we will send you the items!"

Wow, truly impossible to get/implement/whatever.

Let's all pick a SJW company with a low market cap that can be easily manipulated.

We then short this company and convince the autists at /pol/ to ruin them.

>>624145
Why didnt the loan amount changed?

He will be paying the loan monthly, no?

At least thats what I am doing.

With your loans, I would be paying 1,300 a month (this is a terrible loan to have) so 1300x12=15600

38000-15600 = 22400 loans left.

While you are putting away 1000 a month in savings. so thats 12000+15000 initial savings.