/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>20770830
Wow super sneaky shill thread from Ethergem's brightest minds. Truly embarrassing display. Maybe the subtlety was lost when you translated it from Tamil to English

>>20627903
never gonna happen. Kucoin will happen next tho

>>11885926
I am sick to death of you fucking retarded irrational boomer corecucks who appear to be utterly unable to actually run the simulations in your head of how the system works to understand the nonsense you're spinning is fucking bullshit and you just swallow wholesale propaganda that props up your weak fucking position.
> craig wright has already basically admited calvin ayre ran out of money to fund his ego trip to keep mining at a loss
I wouldn't even bother to mention this because that guy is so fucking inconsequential, but because it indicates you actually understand miners won't mine at a loss for an extended period of time, I draw your fucking monster slurping ass to this fact which you just clearly acknowledged. Keep it in your fading neurons as we proceed forward and also keep in mind that about 40-50 exahash of mining power exists in the world today.
> abc is centralized with the checkpoints
Now this is important, because of the above. Miners mine whatever is most profitable, and the net major distribution of mining is based on the profitability calculus at any given point in time. This has been true since the first BCHBTC split, and all delusions to the contrary are utterly false. Miners at the time dropped the hashrate for BTC by 90% and are completely happy to do that to any coin at all en masse. If you had half a fucking brain you would realise what this actually means insofaras it relates to the assumptions of the whitepaper; Nakamoto consensus is broken. The miners do act in their self interest, and their self interest isn't necessarily in the interests of the chain. This is a fucking fact and you need to suck it up and accept it.

>>11876054
this exchange was hilarious.