[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.17974180 [View]
File: 431 KB, 680x594, 756.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17974180

>>17971310
>.m.
Fucking newfag phoneposters

>The WHO rankings have been subject to many and varied criticisms since its publication.[citation needed] Concerns raised over the five factors considered, data sets used and comparison methodologies have led health bodies and political commentators in most of the countries on the list to question the efficacy of its results and validity of any conclusions drawn. Such criticisms of a broad endeavour by the WHO to rank all the world's healthcare systems must also however be understood in the context of a predisposition to analytical bias commensurate with an individual nation's demographics, socio-economics and politics. In considering such a disparate global spectrum, ranking criteria, methodology, results and conclusions will always be an area for contention.

Find another one. This shit is likely not evidenced based. I'm not saying America's healthcare isn't shit, but what you listed is also fucking shit.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]