/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>51381534
Picture of a ape or any other animal = scam. Ticket for a concert or a video game copy in form of a nft = not a scam. This means 99,99 % of all nfts are a scam, not needed and worse than every shitcoin because they have 0 liquidity. Sure you can try to sell them to the greater fool but only during a bull market. Most are just insider scams anyways.

Rember how all the nft cucks made threads about their huge, huge gains just a few months ago. Now you can't see any threads about this faggots anymore because they all got rekt holding illiquid png links on an amazon server. Don't get me wrong nfts will be useful in the future but not right now, especially if you buy a worthless png of animal.

>>50675632
Looks like a lof of fags with very heavy bags in illiquid pngs ITT kek.

>>50309467
>>50310251
>>50312494
Holy fucking shit nft bros are retarded. You own a hyperlink to on the blockchain to a fucking webpage that “implies” the image is ((yours)), except there is no legal basis to your ownership. You dont even own the copyright of the art, the artist can make an exact copy with no effort and sell it as another nft. Actual painting made by an artist is unique, he can paint another one but this exact physical copy belongs to me. For some reason you retards cant distinguish this obvious digital from contract of ownership on tangible assets.
Also, You nft is fucking worthless if the website that hosts your image goes down. Fuck, you can paste an image to a google doc and sell that access link as an nft.

>>50165784

How's Monday going to go, lads? Was last week the bottom, or is this a "Bear "Rally"?
>>49969637
That could be a possibility. I usually have a happier disposition, after busting a nut.
It's often inside of my wife, though. So that may play a role...