[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.18651413 [View]
File: 153 KB, 752x906, Screen Shot 2020-04-24 at 3.19.17 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18651413

>>18651238
>>18651255
>>18651280
So Coinbase releases a product in production TODAY that uses a direct competitor (Open Oracle) standard INSTEAD of using Chainlink.

They purposefully choose ANOTHER standard than Chainlink.

And in your mind, those 3 tweets means they prefer Chainlink? Why didn't they release their product using Chainlink then? How low is your IQ?

>> No.18648290 [View]
File: 153 KB, 752x906, Screen Shot 2020-04-24 at 3.19.17 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18648290

>>18647445
correct, Chainlink is a standard that Coinbase decided NOT to use, and to choose a better, FREE standard, that doesn't need a token or KYC to function.

A literally better version of Chainlink. Coinbase chose correctly. Chainlink has so few users that they have basically 0 first mover advantage. Coinbase + Open Oracle have pretty much already won.

Timo should really learn to code, he's pretty embarassing

>>18647599
That is impossible Open Oracle is a standard. A direct competitor to Chainlink. It is better than Chainlink (no centralized token and KYC).

Hence why Coinbase chose it.

There wont be fake partnerships with Open Oracle like there is with Chainlink (cause it's not a scam). People will just release products using it. Like coinbase just did today.

>>18648110
>>18648154
Because they are using their standard Open Oracle. They've literally chosen their oracle standard of choice. And it's not Chainlink. It's Open Oracle. Which is free, without a parasitic token 65% owned by Sergey and Sergey's KYC. Maybe learn how to code so you don't have to sound like a brainlet

>> No.18648169 [View]
File: 153 KB, 752x906, Screen Shot 2020-04-24 at 3.19.17 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18648169

>>18646754
correct, Chainlink is a standard that Coinbase decided NOT to use, and to choose a better, FREE standard, that doesn't need a token or KYC to function.

A literally better version of Chainlink. Coinbase chose correctly. Chainlink has so few users that they have basically 0 first mover advantage. Coinbase + Open Oracle have pretty much already won.

>> No.18647863 [View]
File: 153 KB, 752x906, Screen Shot 2020-04-24 at 3.19.17 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18647863

>>18647779
>>18647802
>>18647819
A lot of coping linkers in this thread. Open Oracle literally makes Chainlink obsolete (as confirmed by the screenshot). it does the same as Chainlink, but better and free (no centralized token and KYC).

And guess what, Coinbase literally just released a product that chooses to use Open Oracle INSTEAD of Chainlink.

It's not a fake partnership like Chainlinks. The product is released TODAY.

How will linkers ever recover from this? More cope threads like this one?

>> No.18647419 [View]
File: 153 KB, 752x906, Screen Shot 2020-04-24 at 3.19.17 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18647419

>>18646978
>>18647020
>>18647093
>>18647361
>>18647385
A lot of coping linkers in this thread. Open Oracle literally makes Chainlink obsolete (as confirmed by the screenshot). it does the same as Chainlink, but better and free (no centralized token and KYC).

And guess what, Coinbase literally just released a product that chooses to use Open Oracle INSTEAD of Chainlink.

It's not a fake partnership like Chainlinks. The product is released TODAY.

How will linkers ever recover from this? More cope threads like this one?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]