/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16794185

Because huge things are coming and none of you understand it

It does, however, destroy BTC and other networks using SHA256 as it approaches scale. This is because miners well switch back to the network as it grows in value and returns more to hardware investors than BTC can. BSV is therefore an existential threat to BTC.

However BTC is not ‘Bit’ ‘Coin’ because it cannot store data on chain, or do computations on chain, or facilitate a free market for calculations in the block, or create a global microtransaction economy with a 100% legal immutable ledger on chain. Bitcoin SV also destroys the viability of Ethereum since it’s massively parallel by design so computations do not need to run on every node >sequentially, and because it incentivises faster and faster computations it will outrun Ethereum and make it obsolete.

At scale, there’s no use for more than one secure blockchain network protocol because an ‘internet of money’ is a giant piece of global security infrastructure. It only works properly when there’s one architecture securing everyone’s businesses together in the same framework. And ironically, since we can now do op_bignum cryptographic calculations inside transactions in script in BSV, we can make Ethereum a side-chain by paying for their Etherhash PoW to be performed and the results of the work submitted for audit on the SV chain. (Patented)

>>16747014
It does, however, destroy BTC and other networks using SHA256 as it approaches scale. This is because miners well switch back to the network as it grows in value and returns more to hardware investors than BTC can. BSV is therefore an existential threat to BTC.

However BTC is not ‘Bit’ ‘Coin’ because it cannot store data on chain, or do computations on chain, or facilitate a free market for calculations in the block, or create a global microtransaction economy with a 100% legal immutable ledger on chain. Bitcoin SV also destroys the viability of Ethereum since it’s massively parallel by design so computations do not need to run on every node >sequentially, and because it incentivises faster and faster computations it will outrun Ethereum and make it obsolete.

At scale, there’s no use for more than one secure blockchain network protocol because an ‘internet of money’ is a giant piece of global security infrastructure. It only works properly when there’s one architecture securing everyone’s businesses together in the same framework. And ironically, since we can now do op_bignum cryptographic calculations inside transactions in script in BSV, we can make Ethereum a side-chain by paying for their Etherhash PoW to be performed and the results of the work submitted for audit on the SV chain. (Patented)

>>16445943
It's literally just Bitcoin scaled globally.

The 4th industrial revolution. This time not just as a meme, but really is a technological revolution.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0B5VrUrIcMU

Obligatory redpill

BSV is the most ambitious, audacious version of the Bitcoin experiment yet.

It will be very interesting to see what they do and if big blocks really scale through miner competition alone.

I hold a bit.

>>16248386
>Alright guys i'm politically opposed to this and personally motivated towards other tickers. How do I shitpost this thread?

BSV and big blocks are happening regardless of your politics or personal feelings

>>16233001

This

Segwit is the fork

>>16190748

Weather is just the beginning

>>16183483

Go buy some more link tokens bro

BSV will unironically change everything and I'm extremely excited to be alive at the dawn of this new rennaisance.

Many of you have been misled by politically motivated FUD campaigns, but maybe some of you will read this and understand what's happening. Cheers.