/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56561579
wtf are you on about, the usage of the link tokens have always been clear from the ICO (as a reminder nobody was allowed into the ico eccept for institutions, we got lucky that some anons shared links)
chainlink is the only legit project the whole crypto industry, while other projects flash some cool flashy powerpoints and videos in which they spew lies. sergey has been building and using the links he owns to build an ecosystem, strengthen bonds with institutions and build a robust product that even countriez can safely use.
chainlink is and will always be the single best investment into crypto

get fucked fuddie

>>28809650
Sergey has been upfront about this the whole time and aren't being sued by the SEC during the sumps brainlet.

>>25284029
>That's why he's dumping.
>idiot who doesn't understand this was always the plan with the supply

>>25084233

>>25070783
Except Sergey has always been clear about where the supply is going.

>>22867889
https://blog.chain.link/introducing-the-chainlink-community-grant-program/

And amidst all the Uni hype we forgot. Let's all wish LINK a happy birthday.

LINK ICO was September 17th, 2017. You guys are all invited to the b-day party, we're having it on 4channel this year. Make sure you bring a good meme!

>>22059600
>How dare he sell tokens and use them for development, just like the ICO said!
>He should sit on them until $1000 and THEN sell!
I never understood this retarded sentiment. Isn't it better to fully dilute the available coins as early as possible?

>>19846882
Yes, exactly.

>>19587483
Yes, I'm sure they are shaking!

>>19448365
>dumb fuck

>>19433961

>>19382303
>>19382287
>>19382260
>I didn’t read the white paper because I’m stupid!

>NOOOOO YOU CAN’T JUST DO WHAT YOU SAID YOU WERE GOING TO DO IN YOUR WHITEPAPER IN ORDER TO STAY SOLVENT!!!

>>18840067
>yet started liquidating their holdings of their own company
?????

>>18512972
pic related is from the ico

>>18503512
ahem READ THE FUCKING OP YOU MONGOLOID. the link team hasn't provided any more detail since the ico about the 650 million coins

>>18355278
Someone didn't read the whitepaper

>>16914816
Its simple, you simps need LINK to be in the triple digit range to make it because of the amount you have. Sergey owns around 800 million LINK, he doesn't need the price to be so high to make hundreds of millions over time. Chainlink openly admitted from the start that they're going to dump 650 million tokens. Pic related, the first and the last are essentially the same thing so they can be combined.

You didn't make an investment, you made a voluntarily donation with nothing in regards to company profit rights, or anything at all. This is all objective fact that cannot be argued. This will continue to be slowly dumped until no one here remembers it, it'll take that long to bleed this out without tanking the price. Now its time for you to return to rebbit, because this is a crypto and finance board, not a FinDom board.

>>16335125
Why do you continually post the same debunked fud?