/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57981752
$1800x$200 = $6,000,000

>>56352668

>>56209954
Agreed.... Except for those FAGGOT RETARD AMC holders.

>>55589840
Silence! I was not talking to you, silly shilly. You'll speak when spoken too.
Now, if you would please continue with your seething.

>>55363643
Silence! I will not tolerate you shitting up a respectable general with your pajeet-coins.

>>54540241
Yes

>>54307903
Or both of these stocks are tangentially related and one actually has some spicy happenings and people want to discuss them without nonparticipants getting their panties up in a bunch.

>>54213201
The elite are sort of "boxing us in". Their ideal is a young and dumb working class that gets sick and dies before their working years are over. Youngsters always fall for all of the usual temptations offered by capitalism and even if they do get off of the plantation they are 30+ years old.
By doing things like putting onions in the food, flouride in the water, deep frying shit in vegetable oils and feeding us endless amounts of carbs and promoting alcohol, they can essentially guarantee that people will become sick. And before you die, they want you to stop by the hostpital and wrack up a tab of $200,000. This is how they can impoverish your children and then compel younger generations to be perpetually starting from scratch.

>>53049200
Takes one to know one!

>>53031420
But DRS numbers are INCREASING? While they are also dumping?
Are you so sure? Doesn't exactly pass the smell test, does it?

>>52887409
Sneed

>>52772416
Muh nibba, she literally wrote a book about naked short selling BEFORE gme happened. She is a phd who specializes in the subject. Surely she can defer to her book rather than be expected to expound using 140 character tweet limits.
I know you're a shill, but are you actually retarded? "Derrrr she writed an book and she try do sell on relevant topic derpa derrrrrr"

>>52730840
It's actually not. There are numerous anomalies surrounding GME that can ONLY be explained by a systemic short position. If they never closed then they NEED to buy what we own. It's comically simple and meticulously documented.

>>52490810
Think of how dangerously leveraged this is. That line item is NOT mark-to-market. That literally just conjured up an INSANELY massive portfolio of literal funny-money in order to vacuum up our 401k.
Think about how much money that is. Think about how productive a billion dollars could be if invested into your community. Warehouses, infrastructure, jobs, taxes and a plethora of offshooting businesses to support it. These Wallstreet scumfucks just literally create fake money and start vacuuming up our 401k contributions. They do NOTHING. They do ZERO WORK. They create NOTHING. They are PARASITES. They aren't even investing with their own money. They created a MASSIVE IOU that they can never pay back and they went and start speculating and trying to STEAL our money.

>>52412820
Those metals are so rare that paper manipulation of the price does not work and the resulting price action speaks for itself. Silver will most definitely see something similar, as will all commodities once the pent-up demand in the bond market is destroyed and is forced to seek a new home.
Your criticisms of comparing silver to other rare elements is valid, however the suppressed price of silver has us in a very serious supply crunch as we have not been developing enough silver capacity to meet the needs going forward. So given the demand of silver and the fact that we are sitting on the cusp of all kinds of new technologies as we plow ahead in the digital age, I would argue that silver is extremely rare given the plethora of applications it has. I think the higher pricing that is needed will have entire products simply disappear because they can only be profitably made with silver price suppression. Pair the industrial demand and the trillions of dollars worth of purchasing power floating around looking for a home I can easily see silver surpassing even the most wild-eyed silver bugs forecasts.

>>52365898
Massive moves like this (including bond yields) are indications of massive moves by central banks.
I recommend listening to Gregory Mannarino's youtube channel for a few months as he talks about this shit daily. His website also tracks the ten year yield and the DXY and has an indicator that tracks how risky things are getting. He's a little repetitive but any novice can learn a lot from him.

Are you watching the TEN YEAR YIELD

>>52232189
The actually did acknowledge that it was mishandled. MOASS is a ticking timebomb, and there is no way out. It is well known that these clowns are fucked so all we need to do is sit tight and the problem will resolve itself. No sense in exposing yourself to the legal fallout of detonating MOASS when you can inject the share-dividend poison into the shorts and then let them die slowly.
People just need to be patient and recognize the magnitude of what is unfolding. Cellar boxing a living company is as dangerous as dividing by zero irl. It defies all logic and shit is going to break.

Are you watching that ten year yield?

>>51596322
The correct word is density.

>>51570736

>>51552518
You probably have no idea what the cause of shit hitting the fan will actually be. The banks imploding will be because of a shortfall of capital. Gold is tier 1 banking capital. It's the people's exposure to debt/leverage that will determine the how much exposure you have to losses.

>>51536680
The market makers are short and they are the ones providing the liquidity. If the MMs buy to close their shorts then the price explodes higher as no one but the shorts are providing liquidity.

>>51471313