/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>53718448

Again, pic related. That was my all in. You think i never took any profits? KEK.

I literally do not care if it takes another 3 years. My horizon was 2025 from the start and I remember people whining whenever i said that back in 2018.

>>52234311

Bruh, i own 50k Link. Yeah i lost some, sold plenty too though. I've been in crypto since 2015. more qualified to evaluate than you.

pic related was my first ever purchase of LINK

>>29667971

Pic related was my first buy. I admit, i took profit and hedged by holding half in btc now.

>>28695487

Its still in a bubble. Look I believe in it long term too. And its DEFINITELY not going away now, for all the reasons you stated. But we are in a bubble at the moment and it will pop eventually. It may onky go back down to like 30-50k at the end depending on how high it goes though. But its gonna pop and a lot of normies and people who just started buying in the past 4 weeks wont end up making much profit at all by the end because they’ll get greedy, not sell and baghold while people like me actually dump on them on the way up

>>24091595

It is stupid money. any money spent to investing in wasting your time is stupid.
At least fucking about wasting time on 4chan is free.

anyway away with u pajeet. Your talking to a Link general

>>21869162

You dont understand it because you are autistic. benefiting from it even without realising you are doesnt mean its useless.

Having 10,000,000$ affords social status and beenfits and an easier and better life whether you want that or acknowledge it is(sever autism wouldn't for example) or not.

and yeh ur not the only one with 70k Link. Point?
Can't just say "muh money, i have some cash so video games are ok," it isn't an argument is a cope and reasing yo uare giving yourself.

imagine eventually having a millions and just neeitng it up playing video games forever. fucking kek, i would never touch a video game again in my life once Link reaches 1k. what a waste

>>21791620

I own almost 80k Link. try again faggot

>>21299437

I look forward to your post in several months or years crying about how you sold Link at the foot of this rally and would have made so much more if you waited to 3 digit prices.

Then again you are a massive Larper anyway and never bought Link in 2017/2018, just triyng to ratinoalise why you wont buy it now.
back to wallstreet bets with you

Personally I did about 2 months after understanding it. To me it was ovious as fuck that to be long on Chainlink was basically being long on ALL of crypto with exponentially less exposure to risk. If LINK failed, all of it did, if Link was a success, everything else was, and Link would have to benefit immensely.

>>20494860

yeahhh no. I have almost 100k Link. nice try

>>20292650

Yeah but frankly most sensible people wont invest that much into LINK even at this point. thats probably most your wages with a decent salary if its your take home pay.

Most normies A cant afford that with bills and rent, and still wont risk that much.
They are priced out. only a few strange retards would invest that much into LINK still, and the time has almost gone for them to afford a 10k make it stack like that either.

back when i bought this 70k stack it cost me almost $40,000 and even I felt like i was taking too much risk, but i was delusionally convinced.

>>20291400


I bought most of my stack alte 2018, but early 2018 for first buys.

Pic related, have almost 100k Links

stay made delusional late buyer. the 1000$ meme is still questionable but thats the goal

>>20209930

78K Linkies

I have no sympathy for you linklets

You all got spoonfed daily for 3 years, all day,every day, and you didn't even buy a suicide stack

>>20174808

It's already too late for them.
Your projecting. Its clearly too late for you too or you wouldn't feel any need to FUD anymore.
Have enough Link myself. dont care anymore if redditors buy 3$+ Link.


OGs stopped that shit last year once we left stealth phase, now we just watch. only you poor fags have a strange compulsion to keep fudding them to try desperately separate yourselves from being considered a late buyer. Its like some weird illusion that if you can convince yourself you are fudding it and making them not buy, you stil got in early
Hate to break ti to you, but, literally all reddit think the same and they are the only ones fudding this shit anymore, all thinking they are getting people to fall for it, when in reality, its redditors writing that fud now,and upvoting it.

>>17613770

yeah shut up faggot. Probably been stalking Link longer than you.


Just pointing out some interesting perspective

>>17375289

Yeah, you are retarded. I dont even feel sorry for you or anything, im giving a warning. thats retarded leverage to use and a sure sign you have no idea what you are doing if using 25x on 10k link. if you are using 500 links on 25x to sell 10k link then you are still a retard just a small dicked one
Also feels good knowing i bought this stack for less than you paid for 10k linkies kek

>>17280571

And here is the source of the people who genuinely are linklets and saying suicide stacks below 1k, or that 1k is a make it stack.

They ignore dLink for 3 years, now have puny stacks and their ONLY cope is that people with largestacks who have held for years already, will sell way before the nulinker, making it so the nulinker is not too late after all.

This is the biggest cope out of any, and in raw text. lmao

jelly faggot.
at least a few hundred people here have 50k-220k stacks.
this was shilled for 1.5 years before it even went above 10k sats. before it even went near 80 cents.

it literally cost 200-300$ for a 1k stack for 8 months straight.
a 50k stack cost around 5k. thats not a lot of money, especially right after shitcoin mania.

Pic related. my only regret was not getting in a little earlier despite watching it since the start.

>>14700742


Been buying for a long time anon

lmao you fags are so desperate for a pump, look how many threads popped up