/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>341419
If you are going to do Comp Sci, the skills you should master are actually discrete math so you can prove a program's correctness, then apply that to the Bitcoin software and have it peer-reviewed.

That's the next skill you need to master if you do comp-sci, writing research papers so they can be peer-reviewed, they will look something like this: https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf

That's basically a research paper for the protocol they made, it involves some crypto you won't be mastering for pure comp. sci., though.

The third skill you need to master is software engineering. If when you want to start a non-trivial sized project and you don't know where you should start, you will find yourself looking back at the text book you never read.

So having useful skills for comp sci (recent comp sci grad here) is mainly (afaik, little experience but this is what I've noticed in my experience thus far)
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_verification
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_important_publications_in_computer_science
3. Software Engineering, know how to be the project manager.

>>219587

>>168312
>Goy mad he didnt' get on the train when I first started the thread

Oh don't worry the distributed coinjoin implementation is only beta tested right now.

>>113639
>There is no quick and easy money to be made in the world.

You aren't taking enough risk. If I went to Mexico and worked my way up a cartel ladder, I would be making quick and easy money. With the risk of being chopped to pieces or otherwise enslaved/imprisoned/murdered.

>>95003
ERBB gonna make mad gains tomorrow from the recent good news on medical weed.

All thanks to evil jews in commifornia wanting to control a populace will the rest of the nation be freed of the war on drugs, isn't it just magical!

>>26004
VJET

they're sinking money into R&D, so the price will probably sink until they're about to show it off

haven't looked at DDD, a while back it looked like DDD was doomed, then last I checked it's a more positive "the fundamentals r still there!!!" like this jew: >>26178

In my mind VJET is a more attractive option.

also see chart:
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=VJET&p=D&b=5&g=0&id=p87057721782

notice bollinger bands squeezing, I kind of hope it goes down instead of up in this breakout, for more profit if the R&D pays off (buy the dip)

and tons of articles are confirming VJET is about to "break out"

http://www.stockpickr.com/5-stocks-setting-break-out.html-34?puc=quo

http://www.thestreet.com/story/12377374/1/5-stocks-setting-up-to-break-out.html?puc=yahoo&cm_ven=YAHOO

So essentially, why is VJET going to break out? Because it's a super high growth industry? Faith that the R&D will lead to innovative products?

Surely with a negative EPS and only roughly $400,000 USD in cash reserves it can't be that valuable..... But considering the industry it is likely heavily valued compared to others.

Anyway, want to buy the hype? Buy VJET!