[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:

View post   
>> No.19054850 [View]
File: 191 KB, 696x802, 1574033989342.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19054850

>>19054728

>> No.17425269 [View]
File: 191 KB, 696x802, 1574033989342.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17425269

>>17424654
>the whitepaper is wrong

>> No.16833623 [View]
File: 191 KB, 696x802, 1574033989342.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16833623

>>16833614
>contrary to the bitcoin whitepaper
no that would be your definition of a node

>> No.16289446 [View]
File: 191 KB, 696x802, node btc whitepaper.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16289446

define node

>> No.16104771 [View]
File: 191 KB, 696x802, node btc whitepaper.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16104771

>>16104751
https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
>peer to peer electonic cash system
>we define a digital coin as a chain of digital signatures
fuck off brainlet

>> No.16085405 [View]
File: 191 KB, 696x802, node btc whitepaper.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16085405

>>16085361
>post bitcoin whitepaper
>btc proponent assumes it's a point against him
it's just too easy

as to the difficulty adjustment bsv restores the original next feb.
Can you say the same for segwit, calling things with no hashpower nodes, replace by fee, block limits, deactived opcodes ?

>> No.16082763 [View]
File: 191 KB, 696x802, node btc whitepaper.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16082763

>>16082678
define efficient

define node

>> No.16023313 [View]
File: 191 KB, 696x802, node btc whitepaper.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16023313

>>16023306
define "full node"

>> No.15979695 [View]
File: 191 KB, 696x802, node btc whitepaper.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15979695

>>15979693

>> No.15954188 [View]
File: 191 KB, 696x802, node btc whitepaper.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15954188

>>15954104
a full node is not a bitcoin node read the whitepaper.

even if you want optimize non mining nodes then define blocksize limit as a function of non mining cost. At the moment you have a group of neck beard central planners who have no rational argument for a 1mb limit

>> No.15911905 [View]
File: 191 KB, 696x802, node btc whitepaper.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15911905

>>15911900
define node

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]