/biz/ - Business & Finance

Futures trading the most strictly normal range ever, I think we're gonna snap back up to the POC at 3193 splickety-lit :o
>>20310910
Did he take a week off? He didn't get corona did he?

Futures looking grimy, looks like big bois are risk-off ;_;
>>19925106
on the daily there's strong volume down to 2800, we've entered the warzone now. No telling for sure but 2800 is the BIG support that needs to hold (and will)

Futures lookin like when Karl II moved his knight to d7 D:

>>19608640
I unironically really like Crossed, may bee I should read the Garth Ennis ones again o_o
>>19608772
It's institutions selling, probably taking profits from yesterday's big intraday. Reminder they're still long from bare minimum 3140

>>15173858
Damn, they had math counts back in the 70s? I'm pretty sure I still have my t shirt from being on the team in 7th grade

>>14962637
When you sell a call contract on a stock you're agreeing to sell the buyer the option to buy 100 shares from you at the strike price, for example one you're looking at is $7.50. It expires on Aug 26, so on Aug 26 the person who bought the call from you has the option to buy 100 shares from you for 7.50 each. If the stock's price is below that, he's obviously not going to do it, he won't exercise his option. If that happens it will expire worthless and you will pocket the premium he paid to buy it from you, in this case .40 (in reality that's $40, remember options contracts trade lots of 100 shares). If the price goes above 7.50 before Aug. 26, you're in trouble, as you might have to sell your 100 shares for less than they're worth.
I really like selling options contracts, but be aware that you're potentially hamstringing your profits (or incurring potentially devastating losses if you're not careful). Selling a call on stock you own 100 shares of is called selling a "covered call", and it's best used when you're conservatively bullish on a stock but want to hedge against potential downsides.

>>13899606
I had an uber driver last week who was a Russian immigrant. He was only 30 years old but was INTENSELY nostalgic for the soviet union, he was literally yelling about how Russia's economic woes were a German conspiracy. My sister got really scared and wanted to get out of the car but I thought it was hilarious. I kind of wanted to ask if he read Limonov or something but I didn't want to escalate the situation, he was def a little crazy.

>>13544329
"no" :^)
Also is SPX just going to do the same thing tomorrow as it did today?

>>13446491
It goes a lot further than that imo, there's an implicit secrecy associated with homosexuality historically that made gays super adept at maintaining infosec. There's a reason the KGB was colloquially called the Gay-GB, and secret societies from freemasons all the way back to mithraic orders and maybe even older groups were rumored to practice homosexuality as a means of enforcing secrecy. Pretty wild what Biden might be implying with that, he might be woker than people think (I also would have figured he'd be one of the ones doing gay cianigger stuff lmao).
>>13446548
>>13446629
read the G/acc blackpaper kekkies, I highly suspect Turing wasn't merely gay but kinda trans, he was probably into it right up until he realized what it was actually like