[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.6709121 [View]
File: 686 KB, 1274x1050, sergey nazyborg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6709121

holy shit that's a rare sergey

>> No.6610675 [View]
File: 686 KB, 1274x1050, sergey nazyborg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6610675

I have a genuine question about the working of ChainLink so this is not a FUD attempt.

How exactly should I imagine decentralized oracles? I mean, the information that nodes are providing should come from one particular source right? Say some smart contract relies on the delivery status of a package, then the information, no matter how 'decentralized' (how many nodes are providing that information), it has to come from a SINGLE point, i.e., the UPS/DHL API. That's not the idea of decentralization right? It would be like Bitcoin having a blockchain with all the transactions, but a certain field (for example the amount) is referring to a different, yet single, source (the Rothshield API).

I get that ChainLink as some kind of middleman could link data and smart contracts (unironically a very useful Jason Parser), but is it really decentralized? Do they really solve the oracle problem?

>inb4 hur dur read whitepapur
if you can't explain it you don't understand it

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]