/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>23340040
Balancer banned then again? Lmao, what for this time. These guys can't catch a break, feel bad for ya bros.

>>19725340
Doing Gods Work Anon, thank you.

pasta:

>"it appears that the general conflict lies in two issues where both parties fundamentally differ in beliefs:

>1. The benefits of multiculturalism outweight its risks
>counterpoint: multiculturalism will not work if the cultures fundamentally differ in views and if not everyone is willing to compromise for each other

>2. Traditions and cultures changes through time and is a reflection of the society. Naturalization give migrants equal status as the natives of the country. Therefore naturalized migrants, as citizens, have the right to contribute and transform the current culture of the country they naturalized in.
>counterpoint: Migrants who naturalized should put their interests below that of the nation they naturalized in. They should be conforming to the current rules and values of the current nation and impose no change towards the culture of the nation in the public realm
>The counterpoint now creates a situation where we need to resolve the definition and implication of naturalization. Group A believe that naturalized citizens have the RIGHT to EXPRESS their own cultures, while Group B believe that naturalized citizens have the DUTY to MAINTAIN.

>In short, Group A finds romance in change, while Group B finds romance in a structured ideal

>Both are neither objectively right or wrong so how can we ever resolve this issue? At this point the country technically becomes two seperate entities with fundamentally opposing faiths.

>Is splitting it the only solution?"


Has there been precedence where a country divides into two based on political beliefs but still maintain close trade relationships? Revolutions don't really count as they're class based

>>13045233
These are Phase 2a results for their combo trial with paclitaxel
Seriously a YUGE deal for people holding LPTX
A much, much bigger deal than any price action that's happened so far


https://investors.leaptx.com/events/event-details/society-gynecologic-oncology
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03395080?term=P204&rank=1
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/leap-therapeutics-to-present-at-the-society-of-gynecologic-oncology-2019-annual-meeting-on-womens-cancer-300809077.html

From capitalism (which really kinda is a mix of anarchy and tyranny) to nationalism, socialism, communism or any other -isms, there is no system in the world for which resources or power will always be redistributed from the powerfull to the powerless consistently.

Every proposed system so far relies on a benevolent authority that has the citizens best interest. Everyone's fighting for the same product just packaged differently

is it evil to have a merit based society where cultural traditions are strictly restricted to private domains and shall never be part of public discourse?

A society where you'll be accepted no matter what background you came from, as long as you're competent and doesn't impose your values onto others?