/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>14735485
reddit is higher IQ than /biz/

>>14632635
you're not a programmer. You don't understand that Chainlink is centralized and that no devs will ever use it. Pretty much every dev in the space is aware of Chainlink and has been for years. They just don't use it cause it's useless.

Keep coping brainlets

>>14624500
For sure. Not a single developer is using Chainlink. There's no point, it's centralized. The only reason Google/Oracle posted about LINK is to bring attention to their own cloud services (and it worked, it got massive news coverage).

But devs don't care about news, they care about how useful software is, a Chainlink is not useful.

>>14554430
>the opinion of practicioners first before I decide to drop it or hodl it.
devs are not gonna use Chainlink. It's centralized. I'm a dev myself and I could have started using it months ago when the test net came out. There's no difference between the test net and main net. Real projects like ETH and EOS get adoption during their test net, because they are actually useful. There's not a single dev on earth that needs centralized oracles. It's so easy to code yourself, takes 5min.

I don't know how they got their meme collabs with Google and Oracle, but those 2 companies are certainly not gonna actually use the software. It's more of a PR thing than an actual usage thing. Of course if you're not a dev you don't actually understand that all you see is "GOOGLE OMG 1000EOY". But the truth is there has been tons of shitcoins doing collabs with big companies and all of them are still worth nothing and have no users. Chainlink will suffer the same fate.

If you're not a programmer, you really need to shut the fuck up about Chainlink's tech being decentralized. You have no clue. You're just taking on faith that is is.

As a dev, I can assure you Chainlink is not decentralized, and has no clue on how to actually achieve decentralization.

You think this is the first time some shitcoin with centralized tech fools the media and gets "endorsements" from big companies and makes it to top 20? This has happened time and time again.

Also if you're gonna reply with "this is FUD", "kek you bought the top", "you had 2 years", etc. How about you refute the argument brainlet? Do you really think you're fooling anyone with money with these comments?

>>14485438
actually LINK is not a solution to the oracle problem. It's simply trivial centralized oracles. Their plan to make it decentralized doesn't work, but you can't understand that because you're not a programmer. But no programmer will ever use LINK, it doesn't solve anything. It just pretends to. The Google and Oracle partnerships have legitimized the project, but as soon as a dev team looks a the project to use it, they will simply pass because it's useless/not decentralized. The fact that it has some collab with a big company doesn't fool programmers, only business people, and programmers are the ones implementing solutions.

what did he mean by this?