/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56802291
thank you based advertiser, I will surely peruse the services of mexc and kinetix now

>>56505423
>PUT YOUR LIFE SAVINGS INTO MAKE BELIEVE INTERNET MONEY

>>56323384
how many times do you have to get this wrong before you give up?

>>55597800
inciting a bank run is illegal

just posting some fud. binance will be banned in one way or another in the west. you'll have to find some other cex to use. 90% of trading volume is fake and gay. don't leave money on an exchange. funds are safu meme is not an excuse for being ignorant and lazy about your money. various coins will be classified as securities and there isn't a thing you can do about it. Not even a new SEC chair. the cryptocurrency market in the near future will look very similar to today's existing security and commodity markets. anonymous tokens are not truly anonymous and your transaction history is on an immutable blockchain, plus other vectors that are easily tracked regardless of the chain's technology.

>>55058868
>clearly this is how all these parts were intended to be treated

>>52881308
the denial in this thread is pretty substantial lol. i listened to the whole interview and tl;dr he sounds like he's lying

>>52848320
retirement plans are a scam
>send your money to our firm
>we'll invest it for you, hopefully we'll make money for you
>no you can't have this before you're 65 without losing 33% of it
>well you can have it if you're buying a house or some other bullshit
>hopefully you're still alive when you're 65! and then you can enjoy the whole 7 years left of your life with a meager "pension"

>>52835124
https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/us-justice-dept-is-split-over-charging-binance-crypto-world-falters-sources-2022-12-12/

>>52802938
couldn't you withdraw at any time with FTX (besides of course after the crash kek)? They could have just made trades in real-time to cover the bare minimum of withdrawals in that case

>>52766171
the only situation i could see this happening in is if some firm bought up most or all of ftx's stuff, paid off the liabilities, and then turned it into a good business where the token is still needed. but even a firm so wealthy as binance looked at it for 1 day and said no. on the other hand, goldman sachs has an eye on buying up some of ftx but afaik that is it. if you like those chances of a 100x, be careful lol

If you "trade goods or services" for money you're just a NEET in denial

>>52658685
literally who?

>>52498765
truly. if you offered more pay, sure maybe. but what's the incentive to do more work for the same pay when you can go anywhere else?

looks like it's a bit too much for him anyway https://www.reuters.com/technology/elon-musk-says-he-expects-reduce-his-time-twitter-court-testimony-2022-11-16/

kek

>>52420878
kek could you imagine if he pulls a ghosn