/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>49870871
yeah gee i wonder why they shorted
probably just manipulators, nothing to worry about

>>49870908
malfunctioning bot lmao
also bancor cannot damage link, at most they can endlessly cry about the organic failure of their protocol and try to blame others (marines, celsius, at this rate antisemitism lol)

but i find the fact that you initially lied that bancor didn't blame link, but immediately switched narrative when i proved you wrong very amusing

>>49842514
it doesn't lol, it's the death spiral/hyperinflation scenario people talked about
BNT was already on the verge of it before this shitstorm, but now basically everyone wants out of their platform

>>49842047
>Even if they have 20% of the original liquidity of the LINK pools left
lmao what the fuck, that's your "even" scenario?
try 2% retard and even then it's extremely optimistic
>AMM
nobody uses bancor for swaps
>the ILP eventually will come back
doesn't matter, the precedent has been set
advertising your IL protection when it can be revoked at will at any point is worth less than dirt
also people don't really give a fuck about ILP if it means they lose 50% (or more) of their stack, instead receiving it in your shitcoin
>Rewards will stay high during all of this.
paid in your hyperinflated shitcoin that needs outside intervention not to hit 0 kek

posts like this make me feel 0 sympathy for you kikes, nor for the goyim who fell for your scam
you will all get what you deserve

>>49834792
https://etherscan.io/tx/0xe8409502734148669edfd0a90c262e5007c37d6268b6398932225b79bffd6147
this transaction from 1 week ago
tried to get 1500 link back, got 1100 (~70%)
today it would be around 50%
so if this goes by linearly, maybe 30% if lucky
if it goes exponentially, :/