/biz/ - Business & Finance

Humbly requesting an archive of LA's content. I was a consummate retard and didn't save it before he went dark (especially would like his EOY specials, they were top kino). Pls sir's I need for posterity ;_;

>>55830533
the time between me buying in summer 2018 and the summer 2020 pump is a smaller duration than that between the summer 2020 pump and now

>>18512202
well this stuff is gambling anon, don't take on more risk than your are willing to tolerate, deposit more collateral if you're afraid your current liq is going to get hit by a flash crash, for example black thursday took us to something like $1.4, deposit enough collateral/don't borrow more than would take your liq above $1.4, don't take on more risk than you're willing to stomach

>>18512204
>Can you borrow more than what the collateral of your stack is worth?
if you mean your original deposit then yes, up to 2.857x assuming the price of LINKUSD price stays roughly constant thoughout your levering, i imagine you could write a bot that did this pretty quickly minimizing LINKUSD movements, that being said you'd have to do it on dexes and if you're borrowing any significant amount (thousands of USDC) then you're going to get fucked by slippage on Uniswap for example, even if you use a liquidity aggregator like kyber, 1inch, or paraswap it seems slippage is unavoidable, you have to use a centralized exchange, but they don't release funds until after like 30 confirmations, therefore levering up to 2.857x takes time and the LINKUSD price might move or you suffer high slippage through dexes

if you however meant can you borrow more than your total collateral value then no, that's what the liq ratio of 0.7 means, your debt cannot meet or exceed 0.7 of your collateral's USD value or else you start getting liquidated

>>17836636
we're pumping TONIGHT

>>16486518
>he probably eats like a king.
food and other things...

>>15031861
right on

adelyn said she's known sergey since before he was in blockchain crypto, are they high school sweethearts?

>>12475597
looking like a falling wedge that will finish consolidating within 24 hours, if buy volume picks back up near the end of consolidation expect a big pump to 17k sats; also if my wave count is right this wedge coincides with C on the retracement in an uptrend, wave 1 of a new impulse wave is about to pop, if wavecount is wrong then the bounce off 13k will take us up to 14k then back down to 12k levels, from there we pump, either way now looks like a good time to long imo, but im brainlet and new to this so take all that with a grain of salt

>>12224055
nice digits

GOING STRAIGHT FOR THE FOOD