/biz/ - Business & Finance

As above, so below, LUNC has a crash, LUNC has a rise. Normalgroid radically extremist radical extremists tongue Myanus.

You guys don’t get it do you?

>>51643735
>Where is all this activity coming from?
Great question. The answer is….?

>>51566266
this jewish s()y pysop to repell loonatics won't work kike. you absorb and learn quite well but the schizo autist mind is too much for your lot to handle

>>51238001
First we solve the kike problem leftypoltard glowspook.

I told you I would post the stock name today. The stock I was referring to was
>Ticker: SFT
It’s like Carvana but smaller. The price is currently .9 something down from $1 last week.
I’m wondering if I should wait till it’s around .6 as it reached this a couple months ago and i don’t like buying high.
In case anyone missed the DD
SFT has roughly 2.95 mill average trading volume. However this is skewed because of a meme stock frenzy it had a while back due to MeetKevin pumping it. It’s actual average is in reality somewhat closer to it’s daily, 7,000-4,000. (-99% from average). It’s float size is roughly 55,500,000 with a 22% short. On the surface that doesn’t seem so crazy to the average investor.
But what this actually means is that with a short of 22%, and daily average of roughly 5,000, that would leave shorts (in the event of a short squeeze) having to buy back 12,221,000 shares.
Best case scenario, with a true average trading volume of 5,000 this would take them 2,444 days to recoup their shares. When the amount of days is over 11, a stock is normally prime for a short squeeze.

Anons I just found a stock with over 10 days to cover, over 50% off-exchange short volume rations and 18% short interest % float. Should this be an ideal stock for a squeeze?

>>50811388
Nice have another if you want it