/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>58419680

>>58064618
>CME gap
>they almost always get filled

>>57328335
they let him speak because they are so afraid of him and what he represents. now that he has spoken he will single handedly wipe out the WEF and bring peace to earth for the next million years.

>>57064497
There's no fucking way to know this for real so i'll just stick to what works for me and keep swinging lowcap roi gems on dexscreener in the meantime

>>56739910
>>56739924

>1.5million
nice thread

>>56206918
>and then live off 30k a year which you can very easily do

>>55804717
The fact that you can't think of any innovations says more about you than it does about jeets. Unfortunately, they're quite good at inventing - mostly down to the wealth of knowledge and resource that was brought to the indian subcontinent by Britain in the 18th and 19th centuries.
Jeets are responsible for a huge amount of innovation in the weaving industry - single roller looms and spinning wheels were pioneered by jeets; not to mention kashmir itself.
Buddhist mythology talks of a jeet king that invented scythed chariots, though that's up for debate.
The jeets ironically invented the squat toilet; and subsequently abandoned it in favour of the street.
Sugar was first refined into crystals by the Gupta Empire in like 4th century CE.
They have countless pre-enlightenment era contributions to mathematics that I'm not going to bother listing - these are fairly common knowledge.
Contributions to chemistry and physics are much the same - biology less so. Bose, of Bose-Einstein condensate fame, was in fact a smelly jeet.
Raman, of Raman spectroscopy fame, was also a smelly jeet.
Ramachandran, of Ramachandran plot fame, also - you guessed it - a smelly jeet.
Their academic prime was during the british mandate in the 1800s, when their upper castes had the freedom and resources to engage in innovative research. They may be brown. They may be smelly. They may be greasy pole climbers like the Chinese. But they're not niggers.

>>55792679
>>55792604
your insults would have more weight if you could dispute anything I said. your stupidity is in full display for everyone to admire. I'm not an AVAX holder, those faggots are insufferable

>>55457336
This is exactly the sort of inorganic shillpost I'm talking about.
>you don't fit in because you don't think like me
is an obvious pasta by shillbots who want to push a narrative - 4chan has always been a meltingpot of misfits; consensus has never been achieved here on any topic besides the JQ. 4chan is not for finding likeminded people, and never has been. You're clearly a newfag, but you're welcome here. It's fine.
How about you explain how a twitch streaming normie like assmongoloid "acts like he fits on /biz" instead of just making claims without basis.

>>55389198
normies will fomo in regardless of if you 2 fags do

> off peg by $0.003
> depegged
the absolute state of tether fudders

>>55103960
is this what burgers really believe about China? You forgot that Evergrande and the Thee Gorges Dam are about to collapse, in just two weeks.

>>54946196

>>54842284
Just getting a 'mild recession', right Jerome?

>>53518335
do most people not talk much during sex? I'm usually pretty down to chat until I'm really focusing, so amateur stuff or onlyfans seem so quiet. Lesbian porn is usually conversational and fun atmosphere.

>>53518336
>interdimensional war between nordic blondes and greys

>>53109358
>why were women so prominent in coding from like the 1940s through the early 1980s?
LMAO this is a blatant lie. If by women coding you mean the secretaries sorting punch cards and magnetic tapes to enter them in the computer, yeah they were prominent indeed. Seriously, the few women that would venture in computer programming and be proficient during that time were literal autists and made up less than 1% of the total population of computing labs. The rest were menial workers (data entry).

>>52842162

>>52782567

>>52751215

>>52441656

>>52299136
>people