/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>13060741

LINK is so far away from being trusted to handle fiat-to-crypto transactions, that's it's not even funny.

You literally need new legislation or some sort of serious banking partnership with a recognize institution to be authorized to handle and clear millions of actual dollars. That's 5+ years away.

For now, I'll be happy if REQt delivers at least cross-crypto conversions, which those fucker's haven't yet.

>>13019304

This is correct.

The normies are coming back.

You need a steady flow of greater fools and their money to grow the market cap.

Since 2017, there have no actual improvements to crypto or adoption, we are at the same stage of speculation, and no one is buying these bags any longer. The normies that were interested, got burned and will never return.

Crypto is dead.

Is there anything more cancerous and Rebbit-tier than XRPniggers?

>>11936871

So what chance does a multi-level marketing scam whose main economic model of selling bundles of worthless tokens (nodes) have?

Remind me what product VeChink sells, besides bundles of worthless tokens given retarded names like "Mjolnir Masternode" to appeal to gaming retards?

>>11216445

>Calls me a Kike

>Invests in Kike, The Shitcoin

Pic related.