[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.21272131 [View]
File: 67 KB, 737x449, dfo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21272131

>>21271847
buidl is the governance token for DFOhub

>> No.21235960 [View]
File: 67 KB, 737x449, dfo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21235960

>>21235929

>> No.21144570 [View]
File: 67 KB, 737x449, dfo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21144570

>>21144340
>>21144414
and the pasta

Let me try and explain it as simply as possible. Say you write a contract that lets anyone send money to someones wallet, say, a charity. this is what it looks like

charityAddress = 0x123;

function () payable {
sendMoneyTo(charityAddress)
}

All money sent to the contract is rerouted to the charityAddress. Problem is, that charities wallet has changed in the past, and you assume in the future it might change again. If it does change, any money sent to the contract is useless, and you will need to publish a new one. So you write another bit of code instead

function changeAddress(address new) {
charityAddress = new;
}

Great, now we can change the address. Only problem is, it is on the blockchain, which means anyone can change the address, and set it to whatever they want. We don't want people to take advantage of that and scam charity money, so instead we write our own address into the contract as an owner, and put something like this in the changeAddress function

require(msg.sender == ownerAddress);

But this just means you have a single ownerAddress who can change the address whenever they want! that's not decentralized at all! So do you have a frail, easily broken contract with no central owner? Or a centralized contract where you have to trust the single owner?

DFOs let you have the best of both worlds. You can now give voting functionality to an ownership token that allows users to vote for changes. Rather than trusting the owner of the contract, a proposal to change the charityAddress is raised, and the people vote, and the address is changed. But this doesn't even start to cover it. With DFOhub and robe you can build totally decentralized, censorship proof site than can load on any web3 browser, front end on-chain and everything.

>> No.21120102 [View]
File: 67 KB, 737x449, 1596304672921.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21120102

>>21119941
>>21119987

>> No.21114792 [View]
File: 67 KB, 737x449, dfo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21114792

>>21114546
>How could DFOhub even reach that marketcap?
it's unironcially more useful to solidity development than Chainlink is
>Link atleast got the connections while I think the devs of DFOhub does not want such.
???? They know Vitalik personally and are very well known ETH developers. They present at conferences all the time. They have millions put away SPECIFICALLY for VC's
>Besides there’s so many “Ethereum killers” that are no more than $500 million mcap.
It's not an ETH killer, it ensures ETH will remain the king of defi lmao. This scales with the ETH market cap, it doesn't compete against it.
>I’m not sure if an mcap like that is ever possible
it's almost inevitable at this point, NOTHING ELSE does what DFOhub does. we just have to sit back and wait for the platform to gain traction. if this is any sort of killer, it's a killer of pajeet rug scams LOL can't exit scam if you aren't in charge

>> No.20899329 [View]
File: 67 KB, 737x449, dfo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20899329

>>20899237

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]