/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>20199150
As in anon's scenario >>20199583,
selling at a loss would be ideal for tax purposes. Or you could just calculate it against spot prices + a hefty premium.

Also I think most of you anons are overthinking this. Most of you wouldn't meet the thresholds for owing any kind of significant taxes. And of course, barter and trade.

>>19840281
Maybe I drank the koolaid/fell for the ruse, but I think **some** crypto has the **potential** to be as anonymous as cash. With proper encryption, open-source everything, VPNs and non alphabet/chicom backdoored hardware, I think it's possible. I know those are a lot of "ifs", and with KYC/AML regs and flooding the cryptosphere with bazillions of centralized non-open-source corporate coins they're stamping out every bit of anonymity they can, but... there's still a chance I think. I won't mention specifics because muh shill and this isn't the thread for that, but I think that if enough privacy/freedom/decentralize minded folks use certain cryptos in certain ways on certain dexes, I think there's a teeny tiny chance.
I dunno, maybe I just fell for the ruse. We'll see how it goes.
Here's my tentative/ad hoc energy allocation ratio:
40% PMs
30% skills and knowledge
15% various tools and useful things
10% crypto
5% fiat