/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57403400
>2021
I've been here since 2017 and bought my LINK late 2017 and early 2018. How about you Advocate? Remember Lambo Land? Sergey was supposed to take us there, why hasn't he?

>>7470238
Nah I'd just already spammed that text in that thread and only realised after it posted

> brother in law wants to get into LINK
> I don't want that faggot to become rich as fuck
> what do I do?

Can some of you faggots provide me the most recent LINK fud?

>>6476478
Can you imagine what it must feel like being a complete no-linker? The only arguments are that the project may fail or LINK may not be adopted. Noone denies that if Chainlink is adopted we will see $500+/LINK. This isn't some bullshit Bitcoin knockoff or "The Chinese ______". Bitcoin can always be forked again, updated, lightning network and so on, but you think LITECOIN is a better hold than LINK? Are you kidding me? Anyone in their right mind would agree that it is more likely for Chainlink to be widely adopted than for Litecoin to overthrow Bitcoin. For less than $1,000 you can get 2,000 (!!!) LINK right now! That is a cool ONE MILLION DOLLARS once the main net is live (2018) and we see widespread adoption (2020). The only reason these unfortunate souls - the nolinkers - aren't accumulating is because they don't have the patience to read into anything that isn't directly marketed to them like the latest super hero movie. There is no excuse for link to be absent from your portfolio. Perhaps one day you'll look back on my post and be grateful I led you down the path of light. Maybe you'll look back, full of regret for buying into the FUD, right before you pull the trigger.