/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57615529
>but the Luigi pizza shit kinda disuaded me
The thinking of a midwit. Then you would not have invested in $8 ETH.
>I think Polytrade will perform well, seems like the most legit RWA project that hasn't breached 100m mc yet.
Show me a single tokenization project by Polytrade, documented.

>>57615579
>>57615529
Aaand of course the samefagging paid fudder moron could not help himself. Fuck off tourist, are you deranged and evil psychopath really so stupid that you believe to invest $100Ks USD in a small cap is cheaper than in a large cap? Go back to plebbit, fucking tourist.

>>57562110
>>57562114
Document ONE project tokenized by Polytrade, open to the public. Compare that to premium market leader Stobox with first mover advantage and a market cap of only 6MM USD.

Here is another client of them. Very interesting project. Stobox has working products and are legally compliant, unlike most of the RWA projects selling nothing but dreams and illegal scams.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DgHoKVRCu74

>>57562161
>>57562165
You are rambling like a hysterical sub 80 IQ moron. Who hired an ignorant newfag like you? Again:

Don't just run away tranny faggot. Give me your best argument(s) why STBU is a scam. Make me laugh. Use documented facts and logic only.

>>56872235
>but I just do not see how every major government and financial institution would recognize yet another blockchain ID platform and would just agree to forego all KYC??
But they did. That's why enormous development costs and 55 000 hours spent on mainly legal advisors. Working on the ecosystem for over 5 years.
>I mean that part is extremely optimistic at best and naive at worst.
Ecosystem is already compatible with 20+ jurisdictions and 120 countries. What is it with working products that you don't understand? Pic is an old and only a partly list.

>And governments would agree to circumvent and give this ability up why?
They have outsourced it to private institutions, and pretty hard to argue publicly why they will not allow tokenization. Besides, it would be like Satellite television and the internet. Governments hated it, but new tech is nearly impossible to stop and if they tried they would lag behind internationally in trade and end up like North-Korea, so they had no choice. Same with tokenization.

>>56872280
>Take heed anon who reads this exchange
Good grief, you low-IQ ignoramus couldn't be more plebbitor even if you tried.