/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16514936
yeah, something you allude to in your post is what I was talking about in my post here
>>16514454
for people who are active traders, making a living (or just making money) by sticking to a system, what do you do when things suddenly go wrong? what if you suddenly lose two years of profit in a single moment? Can you just re-boot and keep going with the same system, or do you have to completely re-tool your process?
It's a real, serious question that anyone who wants to be a short-term trader has to have an answer for. You NEED to have some savings (or much better, some supplemental income) in case things go really wrong all of the sudden.
>Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth
is the famous quote
for traders, the question is: if your memelines are putting money in the bank, great, but do you have enough cu$hion in your system if they suddenly fail?

>>13467987
financialization of everything is a completely new concept, only a couple decades old.

inflation has only been around since currency was used that could be easily replicated, IE paper money. Even with paper money, if it is backed by a tangible asset (IE gold), then high inflation isn't really possible.
So 'normal' inflation as a concept is something that is only a couple hundred years old.
But quantitative easing (the inflation of just financial asset classes, but not normal consumer goods) is much newer, only a few decades old.

>>13468006
What he means is that is a bot-written article. There is a template and then a webscraper finds and fills in the details, a human glances over it, and it gets published on a website to generate ad revenue. Many such articles