/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>12874276

Appreciated and acknowledged.

>>12587591

6. Are you somehow recording your trades? Are you processing this data to get some ideas about your performance?
7. Besides commissions what are some considerations for choosing a broker in your opinion (aka: How did you choose your broker)?
8. What platform have/do you use(d)?
9. What data feeds do you use and why?

You will want to look for a broker supporting OTCBB access, because that is where penny stocks are traded. Commissions do play a role not to be neglected. Out of my ass I would assume your best bet will be Interactive Brokers.

We all know this. We are fucked. The boomers drained all that was in there and now we are supposed to work to support the status quo. This is why a) most of us simply have given up hopes on their own future being anything less than grimdark and b) refuse to support this system by working for basically free. But thanks for letting us know you know, too.

>>12427407

Again, very cringy. Saying sth along the lines of "It was an important insight for me to know ta can be applied to more stuff than finance-chart" either means you did not understand that TA is

a) not a well defined method of any kind;
b) not by any means sth that could be called a theory.

Please also think about the following: If (!) TA would be a method and/or theory applicable to financial markets only, by what obstacle wouldn't it be applicable to another field? TA is as it stands now is applicable to time series represented by index data points in a two-dimensional coordinate system. Ok. Why exactly is it NOT applicable to three-dimensional representations of time series representations modelling the growth of say bananas over time in length AND weight? What makes it impossible to apply it to this field? The answer is: Nothing. How would that be a moment of insight for you? It goes by easy: TA is from the standpoint of theory of sciences bogus when applied to financial markets, because it cannot be made clear a) that is has any predictive value and b) it is not in any way a mathematically feasible theory.