[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.53026666 [View]
File: 196 KB, 750x912, C7D12ECA-2CA1-4D52-9C9A-BECE5BBDEE52.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53026666

>>53026603
PRQ will be partly decentralized with proof of consistency. The sooner you realize 100% decentralization isn’t necessary or needed when pulling ALREADY decentralized data is when you can finally take the red pill and move on like I did.

>> No.52967973 [View]
File: 196 KB, 750x912, 5A1F04E1-B2E9-4A74-A241-D9ED77DDE41A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52967973

3 reasons why PRQ > GRT

1. Speed and efficiency. GRT uses subgraphs which in turn requires constant connections between indexers and nodes and connections of data. This requires resync of the nodes and reindexing of the data. Just imagine refreshing all the time. This take a lot of time. PRQ has already done this and has the data waiting for you in a data pool.

2. Reliability. PRQ is “mostly” centralized. GRT and subgraphs fall prey to one of their verifiers moving to a more lucrative sub graph. What happens then? Well the integrity of the data is lost even for only a short period of time. This is also why the main argument against chainlink is why would they need link if they can build their own centralized oracle? In the case for PRQ there is already a centralized solution ready for you RIGHT NOW.

3. Customizability. Data lakes are superior to subgraphs because they do everything of the same but also allow either PARSIQ or yourselves to create you customized pools of data specific to anyway you want it. This makes the job of developers working in projects 10x easier. Again, request response time is not always consistent with nodes — any Web3 developer would confirm that because nodes tend to drop from time to time they are neither the easiest nor the most reliable source of data. This is not to suggest that nodes are unimportant! Rather, it is only to point out that, when looking at the case at hand (i.e., ease for both back-end and front-end development), they are not the top choice.

THERE IS NO NEED FOR DECENTRALIZED DATA EXTRACTION WHEN THE DATA IS ALREADY COMING FROM DECENTRALIZED BLOCKS!!! The decentralization is only necessary in proving the data hasn’t been tampered with. That is why PRQ is far far superior

>> No.52940370 [View]
File: 196 KB, 750x912, 8CF884D6-CA80-4A38-913F-6892DABF8706.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52940370

Unfortunately there is no such thing as max cap supply. This is basically dogecoin 2.0 which is another reason I moved to PRQ since they burned ~50% of their max supply cap

>> No.52716212 [View]
File: 196 KB, 750x912, 01106B26-C865-4654-B24C-CC16A7B73272.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52716212

Their lunch is getting eaten. Reminder 1 month ago these were the same price per token. Look at them now

>> No.52685804 [View]
File: 196 KB, 750x912, E869FD28-EB1E-4ADE-B73E-23331DDAF3A6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52685804

I’ve told you guys time and time again. Fed is going to begin the pivoting very soon. I mean walk outside. Pasta is back at $1. Gas is down 40% from its peak. Houses have crashed 15%. Inflation is slowing the bottom is in. And buy PRQ to make it!!!

>> No.52667117 [View]
File: 196 KB, 750x912, 5953314D-F492-42BE-BA1A-80C12644C671.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52667117

>>52666995
Listed with an experimental tag which eventually became a permanent trusted listing. One of a kind

>> No.52635429 [View]
File: 196 KB, 750x912, FF245EDA-2991-4D71-8B9B-C0FE782A6CC2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52635429

This picture tells all. Don’t make the mistake for the next 1000x

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]