[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.58387980 [View]
File: 64 KB, 769x463, 1706371223634955.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
58387980

>>58387947
>because I'm earning 4 percent in tokens alone and if we hit 50 bucks again it'll be enough to retire on rewards alone.
this bit right here is what drives them up the fucking wall kek

the fact that they cannot, ever, aspire to such a comfy position
i mean they themselves confessed to buying paltry stacks of 100-200 LINK at the height of the 2021 mania, so around $40 each. THAT is their ENTIRE stack, assuming they still have it

then, NONE of them managed to secure a staking spot either in v0.1 or v0.2, because they are high time preference subhumans

meanwhile LINKchads bought massive stacks at cents, and staked maybe HALF of it (which still makes for 2 or 3 FULL wallets of 15k link each).

15k x 4.32% = 648 LINK per year
- at $50 that makes $32,400 per year, or nearly 3k per month, just from staking
- at $100 that makes a median US salary

but... get this:

YOU WILL NEVER STAKE, EVER
FUDDIES
THE POOL HAS CLOSED IN FRONT OF YOU
THAT LITTLE PIPE DREAM YOU HAD? ITS NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN
LMAOOO

>> No.58369231 [View]
File: 64 KB, 769x463, FnGK0GuaAAMNE0N.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
58369231

>>58368948
me too!

>> No.57476117 [View]
File: 64 KB, 769x463, FnGK0GuaAAMNE0N.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57476117

>>57476024
This is the valuation model I'm using. I have an MBA from Stanford, an MPA from Harvard, and I've worked as a senior investor at Alibaba and Goldman Sachs for decades and basically I think LINK should be about $5700 today. Let me know what you think!
-Paul

https://paulchencreate.com/writings/f/crypto-research-series-chainlink-link

>> No.57427411 [View]
File: 64 KB, 769x463, FnGK0GuaAAMNE0N.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57427411

>>57427006
Yes. Nearly everything in this space with the exception of LINK is obsolete in the fullness of time and the endless limited release beta mainnet product launches are more indicative of us being early than they are of Chainlink Labs being incompetent (VC funded fuddies and unhinged CeFi victims would disagree here). The only thing that matters is smart contracts, who takes them into production at scale, and where the fees go. The cypherpunk wild west of the past decade will give way to an austere Deus Ex corpo fascism and most cannot see it because their identities are tied up in bygone narratives about sound money and OWS. "Crypto Culture" is fake and gay. Take the Dimon Pill, anon.

>> No.57122025 [View]
File: 64 KB, 769x463, FnGK0GuaAAMNE0N.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57122025

>57115730
>57115764
>57115953
>57115970
>57116085
>57116248
>57116291
>57116453
>57120757
>57121021
>57121224
>57121257
>57121355
>57121385
>57121405
>57121545
>57121576
>57121592
>57121600
>57121632
>57121701
>57121724
>6 gorillion pbtid

>> No.56821166 [View]
File: 64 KB, 769x463, FnGK0GuaAAMNE0N.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56821166

>>56818340
lol why are you so threatened by us bro? we're just a community of alpha male crypto enthusiasts lololol

>> No.56599884 [View]
File: 64 KB, 769x463, FnGK0GuaAAMNE0N.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56599884

>>56599846
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJa2kwoZ2a4&list=RDkJa2kwoZ2a4&start_radio=1

>> No.55545535 [View]
File: 64 KB, 769x463, FnGK0GuaAAMNE0N.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55545535

>>55545454

>> No.55446889 [View]
File: 64 KB, 769x463, FnGK0GuaAAMNE0N.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55446889

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]