/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56989415
always has been which is why the thread splitter puts him as the OP image

>>56596687
>Baggie talk about ownership as it relates to NOLs is and always has been irrelevant.
Kek what? You can't be serious
> You need to continue the historical business to use NOLs.
Again no it doesn't the law states the ownership does not change significantly, what do you think West point homes do anyway? (they sell their good in BBBY you fucking retard)
>That means carrying over warehouses, distribution, stores, employees from the previous business
No it does not you fucking retard, it has noting to do with assets of any kind like that, jesus christ you do just pull this shit out your rectum and smear it on the keyboard hoping coherent words form don't you?
>Every employee has been fired, every distribution center and store shuttered
Again incorrect, do try harder next time I guess
>Regardless of who holds the NOLs, they can't be used because the business can't be continued.
The company and its child, are $5BN going concerns, the CFO stated so, in court. So you know more tan the CFO? Amazing the hubris you display

>>54283692
It actually is

>>53219232
i mean he has been dead for 2 years
its time to let the rigor set in
really percolates my marbles why they'd be paying at least 1 guy full time to shitpost about stock on basketweaving international, and predditor dot com